LIFETIME non-drinkers are less likely to experience mental health problems, according to a study which also found that women benefit more than men from quitting alcohol.
Researchers found that within four years of giving up alcohol, women had had experienced an improvement in their mental wellbeing that put them on a par with people who had always abstained.
They concluded that the pattern was similar to the physical health prospects seen in smokers after they kick the habit.
They said their findings "suggest caution in recommending that moderate drinking could improve health-related quality of life".
They add: "Instead, quitting drinking may be associated with a more favourable change in mental well-being, approaching the level of lifetime abstainers.
"This may be analogous to smoking cessation, which results in the recovery of health outcomes to the level of lifetime non-smokers."
READ MORE: Surge in Buckfast sales blamed on minimum pricing 'trade-off'
The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), compared teetotallers with moderate consumers of alcohol in both US and Hong Kong populations.
Moderate drinking was considered 14 drinks or fewer per week for men, and seven drinks or fewer per week for women.
Heavy drinkers and binge drinkers were excluded from the study.
It comes at a time when more adults in Scotland are giving up alcohol, and the overall intake of alcohol in 2018 was at a record low - coinciding with the introduction of Scotland's minimum pricing law.
Similarly, alcohol consumption among teenagers is at an all-time low.
However, among adults in Scotland who do drink, the majority are still exceeding recommended guidelines - averaging 19 units per week, compared to the 14 unit maximum advised by Government.
READ MORE: Alcohol sales in Scotland 'lowest since records began' as minimum pricing introduced
The sample size for the study was just under 41,500 participants - around 10,400 from Hong Kong and 31,000 from the US.
Those who had never consumed alcohol scored the highest level of mental wellbeing at the start of the five-year analysis.
For female drinkers, quitting was linked to a favourable change in mental health in both the Hong Kong and US populations.
The authors state: "We found that lifetime alcohol abstainers reported the highest level of mental well-being.
"Women who quit drinking were found to have a greater improvement in mental well-being than lifetime abstainers. This association was found in a Hong Kong cohort as well as in a US cohort.
"On average, the mental well-being of female quitters approached the level of lifetime abstainers within a four-year period in both cohorts.
"In contrast, initiation and persistent moderate drinking for four years were not associated with better mental or physical well-being."
READ MORE: Three bottles of wine 'like 23 cigarettes' by cancer risk
The results remained consistent even after the researchers adjusted for differences in socio-demographic characteristics, BMI, smoking status, self-reported diseases and physical activity.
However they added that it was unclear whether the change experienced by women actually has a physiological basis.
They added: "The explanation for our findings and the underlying mechanism are not clear. It is possible that alcohol-related neurotoxicity reverses following abstinence.
"Alcohol cessation may also reduce stressful life events, such as conflict within family, difficulties in employment and legal troubles, resulting in improved mental well-being.
"It is also possible that improved mental well-being may result from the psychological benefits of 'giving up' per se rather than an effect of alcohol, as most Chinese women in Hong Kong use alcohol fewer than four times per month, which may not have a physiologic effect."
The findings will raise further questions over what is a safe and sensible amount to drink.
Another study by the University of Cambridge last year said regularly drinking more than recommended limits is as bad for health as smoking.
They estimated a 40-year-old drinking two pints or glasses of wine a day above guidelines can expect to die two years early and was associated with a higher risk of stroke, fatal aneurysm and heart failure.
Dr Michael Ni, a brain scientist at the University of Hong Kong and co-author of the study, said: “Global alcohol consumption is expected to continue to increase unless effective strategies are employed. Our findings suggest caution in recommendations that moderate drinking could improve health-related quality of life.
“Instead, quitting drinking may be associated with a more favourable change in mental wellbeing, approaching the level of lifetime abstainers.”
Alison Douglas, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, said: “We know that regularly drinking above the Chief Medical Officer’s low-risk guidelines can lead to mental health problems like anxiety and depression. Many people also use alcohol to relax and combat the feelings of stress, but the negative effects of alcohol are actually likely to make stress worse.
"By cutting down on how much we drink we can reduce the risk of developing mental health problems as well as around 60 other diseases including liver disease, heart disease and alcohol-related cancers.
"However, it can be difficult to always make the healthy choice when alcohol is available anytime, anywhere and we’re encouraged to drink in every social situation. Action on the price, availability and marketing of alcohol can help reduce consumption and protect health.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel