Beecham House ITV, 9pm, last night ****
WHAT on Earth did we ever do with our Sunday evenings before male actors tore off their shirts to reveal sculpted chests glistening with sweat?
The latest to selflessly exploit their own bodies in the name of light entertainment was Tom Bateman, star of Beecham House, ITV’s new drama.
Not that he gave up his modesty easily. It was a whole 20 minutes before his character, John Beecham, joined the proud tradition fostered by Colin Firth’s Mr Darcy and Aidan Turner’s Poldark. For a horribly long while it seemed as if the custom had died, but then balance was restored and viewers could relax into the tale of an eighteenth century English trader embarking on a new start in Delhi.
Created by Gurinder Chadha (Bend it Like Beckham) and Paul Mayeda Berges, Beecham House has been dubbed the Delhi Downton Abbey. At first sight, the two dramas have a lot in common. Set in palatial homes with gossipy servants, check. A host of strong women vying to rule the roost. Check. Elephants …. Er, we’ll let Beecham House have that one.
READ MORE: This isn't Downton Abbey - no offence
Every now and then an elephant trumpeted its presence just to remind the viewer that they were not in Kansas, or Yorkshire, any more.
The most exotic beast to be found in Downton’s precincts was the awkwardly named Isis, the yellow Labrador. In Beecham House everything was lavish, sumptuous, and larger than life, including a few of the performances.
We met Beecham as he stumbled on a robbery and saved a rich man’s life. Cut to three years later and the Englishman was arriving at his new home in Delhi, a pile that made Downton look like a single end in Dennistoun. Clearly, he had been busy making money those few years. Perhaps he invented a powder that eased the symptoms of colds and flu.
But wait. There was talk of him being a former soldier and working for the giant East India Company. That was all behind him, Beecham assured a suspicious emperor. He was not in the business of stealing business from anyone. All he wanted to do now, he swore, was trade fairly and live peaceably in this beautiful country.
There did not seem much chance of that happening. A conniving Frenchman, General Castillon (Gregory Fitoussi from Spiral) wanted Beecham off his patch. Beecham’s mother arrived in town, with a young woman in tow that she reckoned would make a perfect wife for her son. Plus, there was a baby in the house that announced itself as often as the elephant. Said baby was “not fully European”, as one of the servants put it. A little more should be revealed in the second of six instalments, showing tonight.
READ MORE: Damien Love's pick of the week
No wonder Beecham, in a bid to relieve his tension, whipped off his shirt and hacked away at some innocent shrub.
Bateman, last seen in another period drama, Vanity Fair, is often mentioned as a future Bond, alongside Scotland's Richard Madden and several others.
Bateman has the physique to step into Daniel Craig’s swimwear. His delivery is slightly off at times, though, as if he is genuinely surprised to find out what is at the end of the sentence he is saying. It does not help that the production has a bad case of the mumbles, that curse of contemporary TV drama.
There is one thing missing from Beecham House, something essential if it is to truly be the new Downton Abbey, and that is a sense of humour. Beecham’s mother, played in a nice twist by Lesley Nicol, aka Mrs Patmore in Downton, is nicely tetchy but she is no Maggie Smith’s Dowager Countess.
Still, it is early doors and the mix of history, setting, and intrigue whispers potential. And if General Castillon should feel the need to take off that stifling uniform one night, who would blame him?
Continues tonight, ITV, 9pm
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here