By Liam McArthur
Sitting before the Board of the Scottish Police Authority last February, Deputy Chief Constable Will Kerr said that the number of sectarian incidents and disorder at football appeared to be increasing, but he couldn’t confirm that because it was “hard to quantify”.
However in a new twist, it turns out that there is, in theory, two years’ worth of data and details on unacceptable behaviour at Scottish football. But the public, Parliament and campaigners are not allowed to see it.
Research by the Scottish Liberal Democrats, in collaboration with anti-sectarianism charity Nil by Mouth, has revealed that this data is in fact being recorded and monitored. It is gathered by the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL), and shared with the government and the police. This arrangement, however, is subject to one important caveat – government and the police are sworn to secrecy.
Establishing this much has been like navigating a maze.
READ MORE: SNP Government in secrecy row over football sectarianism report
Months ago I asked the Justice Secretary about comments made by Kilmarnock manager, and now Scotland boss, Steve Clarke, who was taunted by sectarian slurs while standing on the touchline at a game. Reflecting on the abuse, he rightly branded it the stuff of the "Dark Ages". Upsettingly, he also said he was pleased Chelsea had taken him away from Scotland so his children and grandchildren didn’t have to grow up under the same cloud.
His assessment was as frank as it was uncomfortable, and a moment of shame for both the game and our country. But we don’t know whether the incident that prompted it is contained in the SPFL’s secret database. The same goes for every other incident that has occurred up and down the country over the last two seasons, whether it is sectarian chanting, chair throwing, fireworks, assaults or abuse.
Is sectarianism on the rise? Has it got worse this season? Is it only a minority of fans acting this way? The answer is we don’t know, because up until now the impression was given no one had the numbers.
Professor Duncan Morrow is a world-renowned expert on sectarianism, hate crime and community cohesion. He was twice commissioned by the Scottish Government to delve into the problems in Scottish football and society more widely, and he concluded by recommending that incidents should be monitored and regularly published. This would help tackle sectarianism by boosting transparency and laying the groundwork for informed public debate. Nothing there to argue with – or so you’d imagine.
But what resulted was a pathetic compromise. Despite Professor Morrow’s original ambition being openness, informed debate is only allowed to happen behind closed doors at SPFL, government and police headquarters. Instead of encouraging debate, they have muted it.
This is a problem on a number of levels. The most fundamental is that we need baseline figures if we’re really going to measure progress. Banning this information from every seeing the light of day means football fans are less safe.
Herald View: Time for a new approach on sectarianism
As DCC Kerr rightly said in that same February meeting, we cannot let this become normal. Hateful chants, violence and sectarianism ruin the game for everyone else. It means the vast majority of respectful fans get a bad name and in time could miss out on the chance to watch their teams because others think they can get away with unacceptable behaviour.
It’s absolutely scandalous that the Scottish Government are playing the puppet for the football authorities. It appears that they have used their cooperation as leverage. Ministers seem to have signed up to some sort of gagging deal. The Scottish Government now says that releasing the statistics they have been given could cause them to be cut off. It apparently wouldn’t be in the public interest to disclose the information. No competent administration could weave themselves into such a mess.
Ministers need to step up and explain this to Scottish fans. Who signed away their silence and what exactly does this database show?
Liam McArthur is the justice spokesperson for the Scottish Liberal Democrats
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article