Relations between the UK and Scottish Governments have “broken down” and a Whitehall review is needed to see whether the Scotland Office and the role of the Scottish Secretary should be scrapped, MPs say today.
In a damning report about the state of intergovernmental relations between London and Edinburgh, the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee urges the two governments to “summon the political will to rebuild trust and recognise the need for a constructive relationship underpinned by the principle of parity of esteem”.
The SNP’s Pete Wishart, who chairs the committee, said in the 20 years since Scottish devolution was established the political landscape had changed dramatically in the aftermath of the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum, with Brexit and the diverging political views of the UK’s four governments, which have all placed a strain on a “delicate devolution system”.
He claimed: “The relationship between the UK and Scottish Governments has broken down and there is a palpable lack of trust between the two governments.”
- READ MORE: Brexit: Dominic Raab branded 'dictator'
Noting how while far from ideal, the intergovernmental relationship is not beyond repair, the Perth MP added: “We are calling on the Scottish and UK Governments to make fundamental changes in their approach to devolution to restore trust. We’ve also heard evidence questioning the effectiveness of the Scotland Office in Whitehall, so we are pressing for a review of the role of the Scotland Office and the Secretary of State for Scotland to ensure intergovernmental processes adapt to the changing nature of devolution.”
But a Government insider strongly denied relations had broken down and that, while there were policy differences, they remained “businesslike and constructive”.
He stressed how, far from considering scrapping the Scotland Office, Scottish Conservatives were “lobbying leadership candidates to beef it up as part of plans to strengthen the Union”.
The source added: 'The Scotland Office does a highly effective job strengthening the Union, so it's no surprise the SNP want to see it abolished.”
The MPs’ report also recommends:
*in reviewing the role of the Scotland Office and the Secretary of State, consideration should be given to replacing them with “territorial offices of state” within a single department responsible for managing constitutional affairs and intergovernmental relations, dubbed in the past by some as a Department for the Union;
*urgent reform of the Joint Ministerial Council to provide a forum which is robust enough to cope with different governments with divergent policy objectives;
*exploring the use of third-party mediation as part of a process for resolving disputes between the two governments as the current system is “not fit for purpose”;
*UK Government departments should publish devolution impact assessments outlining how policies could affect the devolved governments and
*the UK Civil Service should provide more effective devolution training.
The report says the “loss of trust began in 2007, when the SNP replaced the Labour Party in the Scottish Government” and the polarised politics of the two governments became particularly evident during the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum and again during the Brexit process.
It notes: “The relationship between the UK and Scottish Governments has come under renewed strain at a time when co-operation and trust is needed most. The current system of intergovernmental relations is not able to cope with the pressure being placed on it.
“Whilst we recognise disagreement between the UK and Scottish Governments is inevitable and legitimate, we believe the frequency and nature of the disputes we have seen in recent years have been exacerbated by a fundamental - and avoidable - deficit of trust in the relationship.”
The Scottish Affairs Committee report follows a similar one by the Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee, which last July also said consideration should be given to scrapping the Scotland Office and the role of the Scottish Secretary in a review that looked at constitutional matters post-Brexit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel