NATALIE McGarry is a classic example of the danger of family dynasties in politics.
Brought up in Inverkeithing in Fife, her mother Alice has been an SNP councillor since 1986, while her aunt is the former SNP MSP Tricia Marwick.
Ms McGarry appeared set to follow in the family tradition.
She tried and failed to get into the Scottish Parliament at the Cowdenbeath byelection in 2014, but succeeded in reaching Westminster in 2015 by winning the Glasgow East seat.
At the time of both candidate selections, her aunt was Holyrood’s Presiding Officer.
READ MORE: Ex-SNP MP Natalie McGarry jailed for 18 months
The SNP’s vetting process at the time was notoriously fallible, with some would-be parliamentarians getting little more than a quick quiz in a phone call.
As a member of an established political family, her loyalty beyond doubt, Ms McGarry made it through a process which ought to have ensured she was fit for public office.
A senior party source told the Herald: “It’s clear that she only got as far as she did because of her family name. The whole vetting process was shambolic.
“People were getting cleared after 30-minute telephone conversations."
Her work for the SNP and the Yes movement contained the seeds of her downfall.
In 2012, she was one of the founder members of Women for Independence, a cross-party effort to boost support among women. She was appointed treasurer and tasked with financial responsibility for the group.
Ms McGarry was ambitious and put herself at the heart of local SNP politics in Glasgow Southside, the constituency of then deputy first minister Nicola Sturgeon.
But by 2015 serious questions were being asked about WFI’s finances. These became so pressing that the police were called in. It was a difficult decision for all involved.
Glasgow Sheriff Court later heard Ms McGarry used her position to embezzle more than £25,600 from pro-independence groups, including WFI and the SNP's Glasgow Regional Association
The money was spent on rent and a holiday to Spain with her husband David Meikle, a Glasgow Tory councillor, among other outgoings.
Damning details included her failure to transfer £750-worth of charitable donations to Perth and Kinross food bank. The cash would have provided food for 30 families.
Ms McGarry admitted the charges in April – and then attempted to withdraw her guilty plea. This was refused by Sheriff Paul Crozier.
Once seen as a rising star of the SNP, she was today sentenced to 18 months and led away in handcuffs.
Her lawyer told the court she was at "the lowest point in her life she has ever been".
WFI say they are pleased the trial is now over, but expressed frustration over the lack of alternatives to prison.
However, it is clear the hurt caused by Ms McGarry’s betrayal will last far longer than her time behind bars.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel