LOYALISTS are going to court to appeal a Glasgow council decision to stop them marching past a Catholic church this weekend.
Four organisations had this weekend planned to parade in front of St Alphonsus Church on London Road, whose priest was assaulted during a similar event last year.
Glasgow City Council officials, citing police safety concerns, last week ordered the parades to be re-routed away from the church.
READ MORE: Four loyalist marches to be re-routed from Catholic church in Glasgow following police concerns
They did so using special powers because a meeting of the a committee which usually rules on parades could not be convened because of the European elections and long May bank holiday.
LATEST: Orange walk campaigners offer talks on parade routes in Glasgow
Now the four organisations, Bridgeton Orange and Purple District 37, Dalmarnock Orange and Purple District 50, Dalmarnock No Surrender Branch Club and the Apprentice Boys of Derry(Bridgeton), will appeal the re-routing at Glasgow Sheriff Court on Friday.
Jwad Hanif, partner at Miller, Beckett and Jackson Solicitors in Glasgow, confirmed he had been retained to lodge the appeal.
A spokeswoman for Glasgow City Council said the authority had been notified of the challenge.
Legal insiders have been hoping for a court challenge to clarify exactly how and when local authorities can ban Orange marches. It is not clear whether the case on Friday will focus on more than the technical detail that the re-routing was ordered by officials rather than councillors.
Speaking last week, Glasgow City Council said the expected scale of the protest would pose a threat of disruption to the community and impact on police resources, ordering the parades to be re-routed.
Police had raised fears over the impact the marches and subsequent protests will have on the community saying that they had fresh concerns following protests outside the church at a march last weekend.
The priest at St Alphonsus, Canon Thomas White, was spat on during an Orange March last year. This galvanised opposition to parades near churches. A group, Call It Out, was formed and has been organising counter protests.
There are concerns over the potential for confrontation. Earlier this month there were 100 officers at a parade, including specialist riot police. Previously such events was staffed by a dozen or so officers.
The Grand Orange Lodge has claimed it and related groups are victims of “anti-protestant persecution” and said police are able to manage protests by other organisations without re-routing parades.
A spokesman for the Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland said: “Now is not a good time to be a Protestant living in Glasgow. The simple act of walking down a street is now effectively banned at certain times.
“Wearing an item of clothing that identifies you as a Protestant will lead to you walking a gauntlet of bigoted protestors who object to your presence simply because you are not of their faith.
“Disappointingly, this is aided and abetted by Police Scotland and the SNP-led Glasgow City Council.”
READ MORE: Orange Walk to march past Glasgow Church where Catholic priest was attacked
The Orange Order has been staunchly loyalist to the both the unions of Britain and Ireland and Scotland and England. It was behind a recent unionist rally in Glasgow and has targeted the city’s SNP council for particular criticism.
However, Call it Out has also rounded on the council, claiming leader Susan Aitken had refused to meet them in order to remain “impartial”. Ms Aitken’s officials later clarified that she felt the timing for such a meeting was wrong. Call it Out said: “It is not the job of political leaders to be impartial between bigots and their victims. She should withdraw that inference immediately.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel