Labour in Scotland may “never recover” after posting the worst results in the party’s history in the European elections, two of its MPs have warned.
Ian Murray and Martin Whitfield said Scottish voters had “delivered an utterly damning verdict” on the party – which lost its two MEPs from Scotland and fell from second to fifth in the polling.
READ MORE: SNP European election result is endorsement of record in government - Nicola Sturgeon
David Martin had been the UK’s longest-serving MEP, having spent 35 years in Brussels, before being voted out of office – blaming Labour’s failure to take a clear stand on the crucial issue of Brexit for the result.
Mr Martin tweeted: “We lost not because of lack of effort but lack of clear message.”
Mr Murray, the Edinburgh South MP and his East Lothian colleague Mr Whitfield, insisted the results must act as a “wake up call” for Jeremy Corbyn and the Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard.
Writing in the Edinburgh Evening News, the two MPs said: “The European election results are by far the worst results in Scottish Labour’s long and proud history.
“There is no way to sugar-coat this – the people of Scotland have delivered an utterly damning verdict.”
Voters had told them that “they felt they had no choice other than to back explicitly pro-remain parties instead of the Labour Party,” they added.
And while they said it was “devastating” Mr Martin would no longer represent Scotland in the European Parliament they insisted he could still “hold his head high”.
The MPs insisted: “The blame for the worst result in Scottish Labour’s history lies squarely with our party’s leadership.
“This was an election campaign about the biggest issue facing our generation: Brexit. And yet we walked away from that battlefield, offering nothing but ambiguity on an issue that will determine the future of our country.”
READ MORE: European elections 2019 live results in Scotland
Labour came sixth in the Edinburgh City Council area, behind the SNP, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and Nigel Farage’s newly formed Brexit Party.
But the MPs claimed if the party had had “a clear commitment to fight to remain in the EU” it could have won in the capital and areas like East Lothian.
“Instead, we were decimated,” they said.
“It is official Labour Party policy to support a People’s Vote as a way out of this catastrophic mess, yet Jeremy Corbyn snubbed our membership and refused to embrace it. As a result he personally handed victory to Nigel Farage.”
They also hit out at Scottish Labour, saying the party north of the border “could have chosen very different path”.
They continued: “This was Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Leonard’s manifesto, their message, their decision to ignore the membership and what voters were saying to us. It was their election campaign and their mess.
“They stuck their heads in the Brexit sand because they can’t lead. We have paid the price for their failure and we have been wiped off the electoral map.”
The two MPs added: “These results must now act an urgent wake-up call for Richard Leonard, deputy leader Lesley Laird and campaigns manager Neil Findlay.
“If there is to be any hope of recovery, Scottish Labour must become a passionate, relentless, and vocal voice for a final say on Brexit. There can be no ambiguity – any Brexit deal simply must be put to the public.
“We must commit to remaining in the EU, and campaign for this if there is a snap general election.
“Scottish Labour can lead the wider Labour movement on this, and should have been doing so for many months.”
Mr Leonard said that he was “personally extremely sad” Mr Martin had lost his seat.
The Scottish Labour leader said: “Labour was the only party fighting this election to bring the country back together.
“The divisions caused by the competing nationalisms of the UK and Scottish Governments continue to be a distraction from both of their failures.”
He insisted the party had put “everything into our campaign and were confident that our focus on jobs and a fair wage, schools and community would resonate with voters”.
And he said he would “continue to put all my efforts into rebuilding the party for the many, not the few”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article