Theresa May's latest attempt to secure support for a Brexit deal has come under fire from all sides.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said he would look seriously at the details of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill when it was published.
But he added: "We won’t back a repackaged version of the same old deal – and it’s clear that this weak and disintegrating government is unable deliver on its own commitments.”
Sir Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat leader, said the authority of the Prime Minister was "draining away".
READ MORE: 'One last chance' to deliver Brexit deal
He said: "The Prime Minister’s last ditch attempt to get her withdrawal agreement through the Commons without a confirmatory referendum attached is doomed to failure.
"Unless and until the government concedes that a people’s vote must be in the legislation, she will not win our support."
The People’s Vote campaign also dismissed Ms May’s offer to let MPs have a vote on a second referendum.
A statement from the Labour MP Dame Margaret Beckett, who supports the campaign, said: "The Prime Minister’s last-ditch effort to force through her deal is no more likely to succeed than her previous attempts.
"She tried to spice up the same old deal with a series of supposedly new concessions, but then admitted she had no way of guaranteeing that she could deliver any of them.
"MPs will be rightly weary of offers from a Prime Minister who is about to resign and will probably be replaced by a hard-line successor.
"Rejecting this hotchpotch offer will show once and for all there is no stable majority for any form of Brexit without handing the decision back to the people."
READ MORE: Sturgeon says SNP will oppose Brexit deal
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the SNP would reject the latest proposals and also highlighted the contradictions inherent in the Tory Party's position on referendums north and south of the Border.
It comes after election materials for the Scottish Conservatives says a vote for the Scottish Tories means “no more referendums”.
Ms Sturgeon said on Twitter: "The PM might not have guaranteed a second EU referendum, but her promise of a vote on one puts the Scottish Tories ‘vote for us for no more referendums on anything ever’ pitch on something of a sticky wicket."
The PM might not have guaranteed a second EU referendum, but her promise of a vote on one puts the Scottish Tories ‘vote for us for no more referendums on anything ever’ pitch on something of a sticky wicket. Just an amusing aside.
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) 21 May 2019
Boris Johnson also took to Twitter to express his opposition to Mrs May's latest deal.
With great reluctance I backed MV3. Now we are being asked to vote for a customs union and a second referendum. The Bill is directly against our manifesto - and I will not vote for it. We can and must do better - and deliver what the people voted for.
— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) May 21, 2019
Several Eurosceptic Conservatives also reacted angrily.
Tweeting shortly after her speech at PricewaterhouseCoopers in London, Steve Baker, a prominent member of the European Research Group, described the reaction of Brexiteer campaigners and MPs as “extremely adverse”.
Mr Baker said: “Of course, I will vote against this muddled implementation of a failed deal which only adds yet more uncertainty. A truly awful situation.”
“Our next leader needs to take us out of the EU, and the sooner they start that work, the better it will be,” he continued.
ERG chairman Jacob Rees-Mogg said the PM’s proposals were “worse than before and would leave us bound deeply to the EU”.
“It’s time to leave on WTO terms,” he said.
Some MPs who voted in favour of the Prime Minister’s deal the last time it was put before the Commons indicated that they would not do so on this occasion.
Former London mayoral candidate Zac Goldsmith tweeted: “I supported the PM’s rotten deal last time as I felt we could then draw a line and select a new PM to pick up the pieces. But I cannot support this convoluted mess.
“That it takes us towards a rigged referendum between her deal and no Brexit is just grotesque. The PM must go.”
Similarly, Tory MP Simon Clarke tweeted: “I supported the PM at MV3 (meaningful vote three), to try to get us out on 29 March. But this speech from the PM means there is no way I will support the Withdrawal Agreement Bill.”
Meanwhile, Labour MP Wes Streeting, who backs a second referendum, suggested he too would be unable to back the Withdrawal Agreement Bill.
“Lots of us have been very clear that the PM’s deal can pass on the condition that the people get to decide through a referendum. That’s not what the PM is promising I’m afraid. Will look at the detail first, but on that basis it’s unlikely I’ll vote for the Bill at Second Reading.”
While most of Mrs May’s cabinet members did not react immediately to the speech, there was support for her proposal from International Development Secretary Rory Stewart and Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd.
Mr Stewart posted: “.@theresamay is right – we need to get Brexit done. The delay and uncertainty is doing real damage to businesses and consumer confidence across the country.
“Then – when we have got it over the line – we can move on and talk about the wider issues that really matter to people, while crafting the future of British foreign policy.”
Mrs Rudd tweeted: “The Prime Minister is doing everything she can to ensure we leave the EU in a way that protects jobs, security and the Union. I support her and urge colleagues to back the deal. Once passed business investment and confidence will surge, building on strong national employment.”
Iain Duncan Smith said it left the EU "firmly in control of our destiny" while Anne-Marie Trevelyan accused Mrs May of "trying to ram her botched deal through on Labour votes by keeping us in the customs union and allowing Brussels to dictate our future trade policy".
READ MORE: Brexit - what happens next?
Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionists, who keep Mrs May's government in power, said the plans were still "fundamentally flawed".
And Labour's Peter Kyle, one of the chief supporters of another referendum in his party, said Mrs May's promises could easily be reversed by her successor.
He said what was being offered was a "strange complex process" rather than a "clean, simple confirmatory ballot on her deal".
Mrs May only received Cabinet support for the package after a marathon meeting in Downing Street in which some ministers were said to be pushed to the brink of resignation.
Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, a long-standing ally of the Prime Minister, was involved in “heated exchanges” over the customs proposals, a source said.
Meanwhile, two senior Cabinet ministers were involved in a public clash over the prospect of a no-deal Brexit.
Chancellor Philip Hammond warned that a no-deal Brexit would cause “unpredictable, potentially significant” damage to the economy.
But Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom, a Brexiteer, said “you have to be prepared to walk away” in any negotiation and she would only support the Bill “so long as it continues to be leaving the European Union” – something she defined as being outside the single market and the customs union.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel