Mike Russell has said he is “determined” to ensure a Scottish citizens’ assembly is representative of society.
The Constitutional Relations Secretary told MSPs he visited Ireland last week to consider the model of assemblies set up there.
His trip came after First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said a citizens’ assembly would be set up to consider issues such as what kind of country Scotland should be.
It followed her announcement that plans for a second Scottish independence referendum would be pursued within the next two years if the UK quits the European Union.
NS: So, I can confirm that the Scottish Government will establish a Citizens’ Assembly.
— The SNP (@theSNP) April 24, 2019
“The EU exit experience has shown the weakness in the current devolution settlement and the UK’s constitutional arrangements more widely,” Mr Russell said.
“We must consider the best way forward for Scotland in light of that experience.
“In doing so, we want to avoid the division created over EU exit.
“That’s why the First Minister announced we would establish a Citizen’s Assembly to consider the best way forward for Scotland.”
Mr Russell added he hoped parties from across the chamber would take part in discussions over the design of an assembly.
He said he would write to party leaders inviting them to do so.
Mike Russell speaks in the main chamber at the Scottish Parliament (Jane Barlow/PA)
Scottish Green MSP Alison Johnstone urged Mr Russell to give his backing to ensuring the assembly’s diversity.
Ms Johnstone said: “A citizens’ assembly of course should represent the demographics of the whole population in a way that, as yet, this Parliament has failed to do.
“So will the Cabinet Secretary be considering ensuring a diversity of assembly that can properly consider all perspectives and help deliver a real, meaningful outcome?”
Mr Russell responded: “The establishment of a citizens’ assembly should endeavour to establish a body for a particular purpose, and that purpose mustn’t be too wide, but it must be representative of society.
“And there are a number of ways in which that can be done.
“It was an issue in both the Constitutional Convention in Ireland and in the Citizens Assembly in Ireland.
“How do you do so? It’s a very hard thing to do because you are trying to balance demography, you’re trying to balance geography, you’re trying to balance sexual interests and a variety of minorities and majorities.
“It will require a lot of work by us and I hope it will be a task that all the parties will find themselves involved in to do that.”
He added: “But I am determined that the citizens’ assembly, which we will establish and I hope will be meeting by the autumn of this year, I am determined that it should represent in that way, and there are a number of ways to do so, and I’d be happy to discuss with other parties about how we are trying to do that and to seek the input of other parties in their views about how we should do that.”
And finally: we need a citizens’ assembly to ask “what kind of country we are seeking to build”. We have one. It’s the Scottish Parliament. And it should be spending its time on building Scottish education, health, economic growth—and not on chasing the SNP’s indy unicorns
Ends
— Adam Tomkins MSP (@ProfTomkins) April 24, 2019
Scottish Tory MSP Adam Tomkins asked Mr Russell what the costs would be of establishing a citizens’ assembly.
Mr Russell said: “That will depend on the design of the assembly, which I wish to discuss with party representatives and to get their views.
“We certainly have learned from the Irish experience it should be an open and transparent process.
“All details, including costs, will be published in full as the process goes forward.”
Later, Mr Tomkins tweeted that the country already had a citizens’ assembly in the form of the Scottish Parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel