THE cross-party talks on finding a Brexit compromise are close to collapse, sources on both sides are suggesting.
UK Government whips are said to have given up hope of securing a breakthrough after six weeks of trying while Labour insiders point to the party leadership's underlying concern, that agreeing a deal with a departing Theresa May could be ripped up by her successor. Now that the Prime Minister has agreed to set a clear timetable for her departure over summer this concern has been underscored.
Labour's Hilary Benn, chairman of the Commons Brexit Committee, said there was little point in continuing the cross-party talks with the Tories if they were going nowhere.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It doesn't come as a great surprise to me because over the six weeks they've been going it doesn't appear that much progress has been made...
"If there's not going to be any progress then there wouldn't be much point in carrying on."
Despite reports that the cross-party talks were on the verge of ending, No 10 insisted on Thursday night the process, which began in early April, remained alive.
There were meetings between officials yesterday and the prospect of the talks collapsing was “not how I see it”, a senior Whitehall source insisted.
If the talks do collapse without a deal, the Government has suggested giving MPs a series of so-called "definitive votes" on different Brexit options in the hope of securing a Commons majority for one of them. But the last time this options process was tried, MPs could not agree on any of them.
Mrs May will set out the timetable for her departure in early June after a crucial Commons vote on the agreement she thrashed out with the European Union, with defeat likely to hasten her exit from Number 10.
Her chances of receiving Labour support for the Withdrawal Agreement Bill [WAB] appear to be fading, with Jeremy Corbyn’s party frustrated at the lack of progress in cross-party talks and the prospect of a new prime minister tearing up any compromise.
In a sign the negotiations are foundering, the Labour leader said he found it hard to deal with a Government in “disarray” and warned “the time-limit is very soon”.
Meanwhile, European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker has spoken of his regret at not speaking out during the campaign about Vote Leave’s campaign claim that the UK sends the EU £350 million a week.
In an interview with Austrian paper Der Standard, he said: “I think it is an incomprehensible error on my part that I did not intervene in the Brexit campaign owing to British wishes.
“So many lies were told, so many of the consequences of a ‘no’ were misrepresented, we as a commission should have spoken up.”
The PM will meet the chairman of the Tory backbench 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady at the start of June to agree to the details of the leadership contest to succeed her.
The move follows a lengthy meeting on Thursday between Mrs May and the 18-strong 1922 executive during which she again came under pressure to name her exit date from Downing Street.
Even as the summit was taking place in Westminster, former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson galvanised the race to succeed her, confirming he would be a candidate.
Mrs May and Sir Graham’s next meeting will come after the WAB has received a second reading vote in the Commons in the week beginning June 3.
Downing Street insiders indicated that if the Bill cleared its first Commons hurdle, Mrs May would seek to persuade the 1922 Committee to allow her to remain in office and secure Brexit, letting her leave having completed the main goal of her administration.
Mrs May wants the legislation to complete its progress by the time Parliament rises for its summer break, which is usually near the end of July.
“If the WAB goes through, she could say ‘this is my path for getting the Bill through Parliament, obviously it is something that is important to the ’22 to see Brexit delivered, and I want to see that through’ and then she is out after phase one,” a source said.
But if the WAB was defeated, she would face intense pressure to quit immediately.
The source said “she would have to say ‘this is how I envisage the timetable for a leadership election happening’ and there would have to be some sort of agreement about that”.
Sir Graham said the meeting with the Prime Minister on Thursday was a “very frank discussion”.
Mr Johnson will not be alone in seeking to replace the Prime Minister, with a crowded field of potential challengers already jostling for position.
International Development Secretary Rory Stewart wants the job and he has said “at least half-a-dozen” Cabinet colleagues also have leadership ambitions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel