EDUCATION is the greatest gift we give to our young people – that is why any debate about how it is delivered should be firmly based in evidence and experiences.
We already have evidence which shows improvements within our schools but, of course, we want to be assured that young people are not just attaining the highest level of qualifications they can but that they are also receiving the best possible experience at school.
I welcome the interest Parliament has taken in subject choice because the future of our young people should go beyond party politics.
The Education and Skills Committee inquiry has already provided a range of perspectives on how subjects are being delivered and I think it is important we reflect on all of the evidence that is forthcoming.
READ MORE: Councils hit back over subject squeeze fears
The introduction of Curriculum for Excellence completely transformed how our young people learn. It also firmly established the ethos still at the heart of Scottish education that simply passing exams is not the same as learning.
We live in a country that doesn’t just place empPastehasis on the retention of facts, our curriculum was specifically designed to ensure our young people become four things: successful learners, confident individuals, responsible citizens and effective contributors.
I am not aware of anyone who disagrees with these ambitions and I can’t fathom why anyone would.
Last year a record proportion of young people went on to positive destinations including work, training or further study.
In addition, the gap between the most and least deprived communities for young people entering work, training or further study is half what it was in 2009/10. A higher proportion of students from our most deprived areas successfully completed college courses last year and a record number of students from the most disadvantaged areas gained a place at university last year.
Under the previous system S4 marked the end of a phase of learning with a focus on ensuring young people gained as many Standard Grades as possible.
READ MORE: Teachers warn subject squeeze now hitting Highers
It had little flexibility and was more often than not based on a fairly set route of progression from Standard Grade, to Higher, to Advanced Higher.
Now S4 is the start of a new phase of learning which aims to deliver the highest levels of attainment possible. In some schools, young people can choose to study Highers over two years and completely miss out Nat 4 and Nat 5 levels altogether.
It is entirely up to schools and local authorities to decide the best approach for their learners and this will inevitably lead to different approaches – that diversity should be seen and celebrated as a strength.
We have to move the debate away from focusing solely on qualifications. We need to make it clear that university is a great achievement but it is equally a moment of celebration if someone goes to college, gets a modern apprenticeship or enters the world of work.
Through increased collaboration between industry and education, the routes and options into employment available to young people are the most diverse they have ever been and the uptake in vocational qualifications has increased substantially year on year.
READ MORE: Narrowing of curriculum 'putting education at risk'
For our young people there is no wrong path to their career of choice and it is the job of everyone working within education to help them get there.
I regularly see schools across the country working closely with colleges, youth work and employers to ensure that young peoples’ learning is relevant to their future learning and career pathways.
So, we must focus on ensuring that Curriculum for Excellence is delivering in a way that meets the needs of Scotland’s learners.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel