A former SNP leadership candidate has said he quit the party after becoming disillusioned with Nicola Sturgeon’s “neo liberal” economic policies.
Bill Wilson, who was an MSP for four years, told this newspaper he joined the Scottish Greens after nearly three decades in the Nationalists.
Wilson shot to prominence in 2003 when, as an ordinary party member, he mounted a leadership challenge to John Swinney, who at that point was at the helm of the party.
Although Swinney won comfortably, Wilson’s leadership bid is believed to have wounded the SNP heavyweight, and he resigned within twelve months.
Wilson was elected as an MSP for the West of Scotland in 2007 and served for a single term before losing his place in the Parliament.
READ MORE: French-born SNP candidate urges EU nationals to ‘send message’ to PM on May 23
However, a picture was posted on social media yesterday which showed Wilson campaigning for the Scottish Greens in Edinburgh.
Speaking to this newspaper, he confirmed that he left the SNP after the last Holyrood election:
“During the Scottish parliamentary elections, Nicola Sturgeon was arguing that taxation is about raising income, whereas [Scottish Green MSP] Patrick Harvie was arguing it is also about creating a more equal and just society.
“I happen to completely agree with Patrick Harvie and strongly reject the neo-liberal argument that Nicola Sturgeon was making. That was the final straw.”
He said said the SNP’s support for NATO was a “problem” for him, adding that he did not support the Scottish Government’s policy on a single police force.
He added: “After 27 years, I thought ‘okay I’m off’. At the end of the day, I felt my political conscience comes first.”
Jim Sillars: I don't know if I will vote SNP in Brussels poll
A spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said: “Many SNP supporters know that their leadership’s attachment to tired, failed, neoliberal economics is not what we need to solve the climate crisis. Only the Scottish Greens’ plans for a Green New Deal offer the radical alternative to create jobs and a more equal society.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel