Broadcaster John Sergeant has said the BBC is right to allow Chris Packham and Sir David Attenborough to campaign against climate change.
The former BBC and ITN political correspondent said people had attacked the pair for producing programmes about the natural world.
Sergeant, 75, added that the BBC was “determinedly fair and impartial” but the very nature of journalism made “bias of some sort” inevitable.
READ MORE: UN issues world alert over 'direct threat to humanity'
Sergeant told the Radio Times: “There are people taking aim at the BBC for allowing the animal rights activist Chris Packham and even Sir David Attenborough to be involved in programmes about the natural world.
“The management are, in my view, right to allow them to continue. In the news department, the rules are tougher – reporters must never advertise their political views.”
READ MORE: How you can help fight climate change: Scottish Greens comment
Packham backed a legal challenge which resulted in restrictions on shooting “pest” birds, prompting anger from some rural communities.
Sergeant told the magazine accusations of bias had been a “constant refrain” during his career at the BBC, even abroad during the Vietnam War.
“The truth is that the BBC is biased, but perhaps not in the way you might think,” he said.
“It chooses to cover particular stories, using words and pictures, which are open to criticism, depending on your point of view.
“News values are not always virtuous, and sometimes there is even a problem in determining the fundamental question: what is news?
“The definition that I like is that news is something that someone, somewhere, does not want to see published – all the rest is advertising. But for many journalists it’s a matter of intuition.”
During his time reporting on the European Parliament, Sergeant refused to do a weekly round-up for all the member states because it would be “too boring” for the viewer.
He said: “My coverage needed a strong British bias, otherwise I would never get on air.”
The full interview is in this week’s Radio Times.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article