Line of Duty, BBC1
****
OH Ted, how could you? With those matinee idol looks and what we thought was your cast iron morality, why take a nation’s heart and break it so? You have let us down, fella, especially the ladies.
For the benefit of the tape we refer not to Superintendent Hastings being cleared of the suggestion that he is “H”, the head of a network of corrupt officers in league with organised crime. We never suspected him for a moment. Even when Line of Duty creator Jed Mercurio all but hung a neon sign over his head spelling out “GUILTY”.
Read more: Why Line of Duty is a national treasure
No, that is not the reason the nation’s women are giving Ted an old-fashioned look today. We refer to the moment in last night’s finale in which the head of AC-12 confessed to ogling mucky pictures. “I was looking at pornography,” Ted told his interrogator sheepishly when she accused him of destroying a laptop because it contained data confirming he was H.
Read more: Line of Duty: 12 AC-12 related questions answered - or not - in finale
Not for the first time in this special 90-minute episode, you could have heard a gnat’s sewing needle drop. “Nothing illegal, nothing extreme,” Ted rushed to add. “I just did not want it to be found.” We will talk about this later, fella; there is too much else to be getting on with, in particular asking if last night’s curtain dropper met the show’s extremely high standards.
Mercurio certainly gave loyal fans value for money, skilfully pulling together strands and characters from previous series. The addition of Anna Maxwell Martin to the mix as Chief Super Carmichael was a masterstroke. If pursed lips could kill, the body count for this series would be even higher.
Line of Duty star assembles dementia choir
Adrian Dunbar was outstanding as Hastings, a man whose assumptions about himself as a fundamentally good man were put to the test as never before. His face on learning the truth about undercover cop John Corbett (Stephen Graham) was a picture worth a thousand words. Scotland’s Martin Compston, Essex accent flawless as ever, did not have as much to do in the finale, but when he did contribute it turned out to be vital, while DCI Kate Fleming, played by Vicky McClure, showed she has the makings of an AC-12 chief if a vacancy should arise.
But some elements were decidedly iffy. The big reveal about H, or rather the contrived way it came about, was as close as Line of Duty has ever come to jumping the shark, of pulling a move so outrageous that it has viewers throwing their hands in the air and shouting, “Oh, come ON!” The will-there-won’t-there be a last minute flee from the scene borrowed heavily from a past episode, and some characters were rather too obviously set up to be wrong ‘uns.
Above all, there were too many things sprung on the viewer at the last minute, things they could not possibly have known, such as what Vicky and Steve discovered about Corbett’s past that had them tearing back to HQ. Agatha Christie would have taken a dim view of such brazen jiggery-pokery, but then Aggie was not writing a blockbuster police procedural in a multi-channel television age.
The millions of viewers who have made Line of Duty the most watched programme of the year will forgive the odd dodgy moment in the finale because this series as a whole has been excellent. In Corbett, Mercurio created a character of real substance, one whose background brought the past woes of Northern Ireland into timely focus once more. He showed that even after so many series and twists, a great dramatist can still make you yelp with shock; and he demonstrated that there is life in this tale yet. Another series? For the benefit of the tape, 13 million viewers and counting shout “Yes”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel