Theatre
The Mistress Contract
Tron Theatre, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
Four Stars
To paraphrase a non-pictorial edition of the Kama Sutra, and perhaps drag it into what may or may not be more enlightened times, a man and a woman will never win each other without a great deal of talking. Such a philosophical take on intimacy hangs over much of Abi Morgan's play, adapted from the anonymous memoir of a real life non-couple, who took a business-like approach to their non-relationship to the extent of drawing up a contract.
Said document decreed that the woman known only as She would be paid to be the mistress of her non-partner, known as He, with no visible strings attached. Over snapshots of the next 30 years or so, we see She and He before and after sex, recording onto cassette every piece of verbal horseplay from 1981 onwards.
Cal MacAninch and Lorraine McIntosh never make heavy weather of things in Eve Nicol's Scottish premiere of the play for the Tron's Mayfesto season. This is despite such self-absorbed warts and all documentation drawn from the book’s intellectual line of inquiry resembling everyday co-counselling. Much of this is managed on Alisa Kalyanova's chic-looking living room set by an easy physicality between the pair, choreographed by movement director Emma Jayne Park with an understated ordinariness.
In terms of the seemingly endless discussion between the two, as they grow old together apart, their sparring – about sex, the different needs of men and women and how each affects the other – could have been recorded yesterday. The fact that nothing remotely new is being said, let alone resolved, seems to be the point.
Perhaps most telling is that, after the apparent radicalism of such a long-term experiment, it's noticeable that what She and He resemble most of all at the end of the play is an old married couple. Such co-dependence shouldn’t come as a surprise, and, despite the pension plan of the book deal, it's pretty much business as usual.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here