TV wildlife expert Chris Packham said he has been sent death threats after backing a legal challenge which resulted in restrictions on shooting “pest” birds.
The BBC Springwatch presenter said he had received “threats of a very serious nature” against him and his family.
READ MORE: Phone threats to hunters who go on traditional hunt for babybirds
Packham was part of an action which resulted in Natural England revoking three general licences which allowed the shooting of 16 species of bird, including crows, magpies, Canada geese and feral and wood pigeons.
Wildlife broadcaster @ChrisGPackham has received suspicious packages and death threats, after backing a ban on farmers indiscriminately killing 'pest' birds.
He says 'take aim at me', but calls for people to stop targeting charities and organisations he's affiliated with. pic.twitter.com/9Br6hTpBTC
— Good Morning Britain (@GMB) April 30, 2019
He told Good Morning Britain: “The police have spent quite a considerable amount of time at my house over the last few days.
“We’ve had packages sent containing human excrement. Last night, I can’t speak too much about what happened last night because I haven’t been in touch with the police yet.”
Asked if there was another threat, he said there was a “much more serious thing”, adding that he had received “death threats of a very serious nature” against him and his family.
Packham said it is not just his family being targeted, but also businesses he works with.
“I’m very resistant to this sort of thing,” he said, but added: “What worries me is that the charities that I’m affiliated with, the small businesses that I work for, these people aren’t set up to take this sort of abuse, and yet they’ve had to close their websites, their TripAdvisor accounts have had to be shut down, because they’ve been bombarded by these bullies who want to take aim at me.
“My message is clear. Please, take aim at me, but leave all of the charities, all of the other businesses that I work with, leave them out of it. They’re not necessarily sharing my views.
“They’re not a fair target.”
READ MORE: ‘World’s deadliest bird’ kills owner after fall
Packham said he can understand the argument from farmers because they have been “misinformed”.
Bodies including the British Association of Shooting and Conservation (BASC), Countryside Alliance, and the National Gamekeepers Organisation have written an open letter to Environment Secretary Michael Gove calling on him to launch an investigation into Natural England’s decision.
They complained that the revocation of the licences which previously allowed them to freely shoot birds such as carrion crows, wood pigeons, magpies and Canada geese had left them in chaos.
For more information on general licences, read an update from our interim Chief Executive Marian Spain here: https://t.co/0yCmyRMS2s
— Natural England (@NaturalEngland) April 28, 2019
Natural England, the body advising the Government on managing the natural environment, took the decision after it was threatened with legal action by environmentalists.
Wild Justice – whose directors include Packham – sought a judicial review of the licences, which Natural England ultimately decided not to fight, believing it would lose.
As a result, three general licences for controlling wild birds were revoked on April 23, to be replaced by individual licences.
By Friday, only a new licence allowing the killing of carrion crows had been issued.
Tweet posted by Chris Packham showing dead crows left hanging outside his home (Chris Packham/PA)
The issue was catapulted to national attention after the bodies of two dead crows were hung from Packham’s gate two days after Natural England’s decision.
BASC condemned the attack on the presenter’s home but said the new licensing rules are causing havoc at one of the busiest times of the farming calendar.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel