SOCIAL workers could have prevented abuse suffered by a disabled woman before she was murdered by her sister, a review has found.
Sharon Greenop's body was found in her house in Troon, South Ayrshire, during 2016. The 46-year-old suffered a series of injuries including multiple rib fractures.
Her sister, Lynette Greenop, was convicted of her murder at the High Court in Glasgow and handed a mandatory life sentence in May last year.
Ms Greenop's daughter Shayla, 21, was found not proven after also being accused of her murder.
A court heard Ms Greenop had been abused over a seven-year period before her death.
Prior to her death, Sharon had received a community care package from social work services at the South Ayrshire Health and Social Care Partnership.
A significant case review was carried out to consider social work involvement with the victim and to see whether there were lessons to be learned about protecting at-risk adults.
READ MORE: Disabled woman's sister guilty of murder as daughter is cleared
The review published by South Ayrshire Council, apologised for "failing Sharon".
It found that a decision to end Sharon's care package was "flawed" and "allowed the circumstances to develop that ultimately led to her death".
It concluded that the managers involved could not have foreseen the violent death Sharon would suffer, but it found that "more could and should have been done to identify Sharon Greenop as a vulnerable adult and to intervene to ensure her protection from harm".
It found that the decision to allow Sharon's care package to be closed was flawed and that the decision to do so "exposed Sharon to the abuse which ultimately ended her life".
It also found that the partnership missed opportunities to raise adult protection concerns over Sharon's wellbeing, which could have resulted in interventions that could have stopped Sharon being abused.
The document noted that Sharon's case had not been formally reviewed since 2012 and that the quality of that review was "poor".
Hers was one of hundreds of cases that had not been reviewed over a number of years, despite a statutory obligation and a corporate policy to undertake annual reviews.
Furthermore, record-keeping was extremely poor and hampered by outdated information systems while management practices were found to be poor in places.
The review, led by independent chair David Crawford, has issued five recommendations to the partnership.
These include ensuring that proper steps are taken before the closure of a care package and that arrangements are in place to review care packages at least once a year.
Tim Eltringham, director of the South Ayrshire Health and Social Care Partnership, said: "We take our responsibilities to protect vulnerable adults from harm very seriously. While we know it won't bring Sharon back, we are deeply sorry that we failed Sharon and her family and I have delivered that apology in person to her sister, Diane Hogg.
"We fully accept the findings of the review and recognise where we fell down in delivering the standard and quality of service that Sharon needed and deserved. We're doing everything in our power to ensure this cannot happen again and we've made a lot of progress in improving how we work."
In a statement on behalf of Sharon's family, Diane Hogg said: "I questioned the continuity of care and the system which should have protected Sharon.
"As the review was progressing and urgent recommendations were being administered, I knew that other areas would take time to change. So, with hindsight maybe understanding and insight, looking at the past mistakes it could prevent another family from undergoing the same traumatic experience. Hopefully these lessons can and will be learned.
"Although I have answers, it still leaves an undeniable feeling within myself that just maybe my sister would still be alive if protocols and policies had been followed."
Professor Paul Martin, chair of the South Ayrshire Adult Protection Committee, said: "It's clear that steps could have - and should have - been taken by the South Ayrshire Health and Social Care Partnership that could have stopped the abuse she (Sharon) suffered before her untimely death.
"That's unacceptable and through the Adult Protection Committee and the Chief Officers' Group - which I report to and includes the chief officers from the council, police and NHS - I'll be ensuring that the necessary improvements are put in place as quickly as possible and visibly make a difference for people and communities in South Ayrshire."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here