Two police officers linked to the custody death of Fife man Sheku Bayoh are to be allowed to retire early on medical grounds following a court ruling.
Constables Nicole Short and Alan Paton were forced to take their fight to the Court of Session in Edinburgh after the Scottish Police Authority refused them permission to stand down.
A ruling was published earlier this week by Lord Stephen Woolman who ordered the SPA to reconsider their decision within 30 days.
The judgment revealed Ms Short, 32, was suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and was now “permanently disabled from undertaking the ordinary duties of a police officer”.
- READ MORE: PC feared Sheku Bayoh would kill someone
Her colleague, Mr Paton, 44, has reportedly received extensive psychological counselling and his grounds for retirement have been supported by a psychiatrist.
Both officers were left traumatised following the controversial arrest of Mr Bayoh in Kirkcaldy on May 3, 2015.
They had been called to the Templehall area of the town after calls reporting that a man was seen behaving erratically with a knife.
The judgment included an account of the morning by Ms Short, who said she feared “a murder was about to place”.
She also described Mr Bayoh, 31, as being “like a zombie” and his “eyes were totally black”.
She said that despite him being hit with CS and PAVA spray, he allegedly reacted by “laughing and wiping it away from his eyes like it was just water”.
Ms Short described receiving “an enormous blow” to the back of her head which lifted her off her feet as she tried to run away from Mr Bayoh, who was under the influence of drugs.
She was taken to hospital before returning to Kirkcaldy police station later the same day.
Gas engineer Mr Bayoh was also taken to hospital for treatment but was pronounced dead a short time later.
Both Ms Short, who has nine years’ service, and Mr Paton, who has served for 17 years, have both been off long-term sick since and had asked to retire.
The Scottish Police Authority refused their application until it was known if either of the two would face criminal proceedings following the incident.
But Lord Woolman found their decision was “irrational” and that no one had suggested the officers were culpable to any degree in respect of the incident.
The Scottish Police Federation, which represented both officers through solicitor advocate Peter Watson, confirmed the SPA had made its final decision.
Deputy general secretary David Kennedy said: “We welcome the decision by the SPA, which makes clear these officers suffered significant injury in the execution of their duties and qualify to retire on grounds of ill-health.
“We continue to support all officers involved in these tragic events and hope that a date for a fatal accident inquiry or a public inquiry is set so all the facts can be judicially determined.”
Mr Watson added: “The Scottish Police Authority undertook to follow the directions of the court that required them to re-examine their decision within 30 days. In fairness to the SPA, they dealt with that quickly and, as at 5pm on Thursday, I was advised that the decision had been made to grant ill-health retirement. This is a great relief to the officers concerned, both of whom continue to suffer serious ill-health issues.
“We are anxious to get to a judicial inquiry as quickly as possible for the interests of everyone, including Mr Bayoh’s family, but also for the officers. What has to be remembered is that during this period of time, because they are serving officers, they have not been able to engage or respond to a constant stream of media comments.”
A spokeswoman for the Scottish Police Authority said it had reviewed the decision as instructed by Lord Woolman but was unable to comment further at this stage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel