CONTROVERSIAL tests for five-year-olds will be reformed after concerns they left children distressed, the Scottish Government has said.
John Swinney, the Education Secretary, said improved guidance for teachers would help them support children during the assessments.
Mr Swinney said the reforms would help ensure the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) could be delivered in a way that was compatible with a play-based classroom environment.
And he said it would be made clear the tests were not "high stakes" and were intended to help teachers with their judgements of a child's progress.
READ MORE: Primary school testing is not child abuse
The changes are outlined in a report from the P1 Practitioner Forum, which included primary teachers, which was set up to look at the assessments after their controversial introduction.
Mr Swinney said: "I would like to thank the forum for their recommendations, which are grounded in the realities of teaching P1 and are informed by their own experiences and professional knowledge.
“We will work to make immediate improvements where we can to enhance the experience of both learners and educators and ensure the assessments can continue to be delivered as part of everyday learning and teaching.
“Standardised assessments are an effective additional tool to support teacher professional judgement and identify next steps in a child’s learning."
Mr Swinney said the assessments were "particularly useful" in the early years to help close the attainment gap.
READ MORE: Primary pupils left 'shaking and crying' by P1 tests
Forum chairwoman Professor Sue Ellis, from Strathclyde University, said: "It is important people listen carefully to what these imaginative and experienced P1 teachers have to say.
“They offer plenty of good ideas about how to make the SNSAs work in practice and the report contains useful advice as well as recommendations for the future."
The decision to establish the forum was taken in advance of the separate decision to set up an independent review of P1 assessments led by David Reedy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel