Scotland’s Constitutional Relations Secretary has said a second Brexit referendum including an option to remain should be held, even if agreement is reached on the Prime Minister’s deal.
Mike Russell said if a compromise is found enabling a deal to pass, people across the UK should be given the chance to vote on it.
He said this referendum should include the option to remain in the EU.
READ MORE: Ministers urged to set date for minimum student income in Scotland
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, he said: “What I would want to see at this stage is either no Brexit – that’s rescinding, revoking the Article 50 process – or, at the very least, a referendum on the choices before us.
“And the choice has to include revoking Article 50 and stopping this, because it’s been the most enormous disaster, the most enormous, costly disaster.
Asked if a second referendum should still be held if a compromise is reached on Theresa May’s Brexit deal before the current deadline of October 31, Mr Russell replied: “Yes. People have the right to choose, they have the right to say they don’t wish to do this.
READ MORE: Report finds UK Government 'alienated' Edinburgh and Cardiff over Brexit
“Things have changed enormously over the last three years and we also know that the original referendum was deeply flawed.
“I hope the Labour Party is in this position too in its discussions with the UK Government, because I don’t think it could be conceived of now without giving people the chance to say what they thought.”
Scotland’s Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell called for a second referendum (Jane Barlow/PA)
Asked if he would accept the result of a second referendum, after Scotland voted 62% to remain and 38% to leave in 2016, he said: “If we got to the situation where Scotland continued to vote to stay in the EU and was being taken out against its will, nothing would have changed, that’s quite clear.”
He added: “I would not accept a situation where Scotland was taken out against her will, that would be impossible to do.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel