Theresa May has been overwhelmingly backed by MPs to seek to delay Brexit to June 30, amid Tory warnings over the impact of holding European Parliament elections.
The Commons approved a Government motion on the extension request by 420 votes to 110, majority 310.
The Prime Minister was forced to bring forward the motion under legislation pushed by Labour former minister Yvette Cooper, as part of a parliamentary bid to prevent a no-deal Brexit on April 12 – although any extension is subject to the decision of the EU.
Solicitor General Robert Buckland told MPs they “must find a way to find a plan for the way forward” to leave the EU with a deal and outlined how the UK would be legally required to take part in European Parliament elections if it remains a member state on May 23.
READ MORE: Brexit - What happens if the UK crashes out of the EU without a deal
But he suggested British MEPs may not have to take their seats even if they are elected – should Westminster agree a deal in the coming weeks.
Mr Buckland said: “The new European Parliament does not meet until early July and therefore it is important for us to distinguish the need to have elections and then the requirement for British MEPs to have to actually sit in the European Parliament if we are indeed to leave the European Union before early July.”
Conservative former leader Iain Duncan Smith said Mr Buckland had suggested the UK may fight the European elections then “not to allow its MEPs to take their seats”.
Mr Buckland replied: “I think we’re obliged to, as a matter of law, prepare for European elections but if we have left and exited the European Union by the end of June then we are no longer members, we’re third countries and therefore the requirement to take our seats in the European Parliament would have ended.”
READ MORE: Michel Barnier - "The Withdrawal Agreement is not going to be reopened"
Conservative former attorney general Dominic Grieve said the UK cannot “go on lurching from one cliff-edge crisis to another” and outlined his desire for a longer extension to allow MPs to “make some decisions without the pressures”.
But Conservative former minister Tim Loughton, making an appeal to French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Angela Merkel, said: “Please, put us out of our misery now, as this House and this Government appear incapable of doing.
“At tomorrow’s EU Council, please vote against any further extensions to Article 50 and oblige the UK to leave the EU on Friday on WTO terms, as you previously said you would only honour any application for an extension if there was a credible reason so to do. That credible reason does not not exist.”
Mrs May is meeting with EU leaders
Mr Loughton added: “If the EU elections go ahead, it is highly likely the UK will elect an army of Nigel Farage mini-mes, who I am afraid will wreak havoc with the European Parliament and wreck your calculations about the balance of power within the EU.”
Labour former minister Kate Hoey also said: “It does seem really humiliating for this country to have our Prime Minister going over to the European union to literally beg for an extension. What is this saying about our country?”
Tory MP Anne Main (St Albans) noted: “I think we are becoming a laughing stock, and I don’t know why anyone would turn up for any future referendum or even elections when they can not believe a word that goes on in here.”
READ MORE: How would a second Brexit referendum work?
For Labour, shadow Brexit minister Matthew Pennycook said the Government should be “mortified” that they have “to ask once again for this House’s approval to seek an extension to the Article 50 process”.
He said the fact one is required is a “damning indictment of the Government’s mishandling of the negotiations, and its failure to secure a deal that could command the confidence of the Commons”.
Mr Pennycook also confirmed his party “wholeheartedly supported the Government’s efforts” to secure an extension to Article 50, and said Labour expects them to agree to any “reasonable extension” beyond June 30.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel