Residents and businesses in towns without any banks face “substantial financial hardship”, according to a report.
The study was carried out by Cambuslang Community Council after three bank branches closed within 18 months of each other in the South Lanarkshire town.
Between 2016 and 2017, Clydesdale, Royal Bank of Scotland and TSB all announced closures, leaving Cambuslang without a bank.
The report noted the decisions were in part due to a fall in the number of bank transactions and an increase in the use of mobile and online banking.
The community council claimed none of the banks had consulted with them or any other community organisations and did not carry out the required impact assessment of the potential effects of closing branches.
A total of 420 Cambuslang residents and 85 businesses responded to a survey conducted as part of the study to gather views on the impact of the closures.
It found more than 70 per cent of respondents felt the closures had a major negative impact on them. Around 65% also said they had found accessing cash difficult since the branches had been closed.
Findings in the study also highlighted a largely negative impact on businesses, with more than 60% of people saying the closure of branches had caused them to shop less often on the town’s main street.
The report’s co-author, Professor John Bachtler, said: “The findings from our research in Cambuslang include heart-rending accounts of the financial hardship being suffered by people who are least able to deal with the consequences of branch closures – the elderly, the disabled, benefit recipients, those with caring responsibilities and those on low incomes.
“The banks are worsening social exclusion rather than reducing it. Further, the closure of bank branches is undermining UK and Scottish government policies for town centre regeneration. The evidence from Cambuslang and other towns is that branch closures lead to people shopping elsewhere and a loss of trade for unbanked main streets.”
At Westminster, the Scottish Affairs Committee is conducting an inquiry into financial services access, with a decline of ATMs across the country cited as an area of key concern. The report has been submitted to the committee, with its authors calling for a statutory obligation on the banking sector to ensure a minimum weekly banking service in all communities.
Mr Bachtler added: “Government has taken a far too permissive role in allowing communities to become unbanked.
“There are many challenges facing our towns and communities that we can’t control, but branch closures are not one of them.
“Policymakers need to live up to their social obligations and the banks needs to deliver on their promises.”
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “This survey clearly demonstrates that there is a continuing need for cash to be readily available to all, and people in our communities need to know that they have secure, free access to cash to allow them to go about their daily lives. This is also vital for these local businesses, such as hospitality businesses, that continue to rely, at least to some extent, upon cash for transactions.
“We support calls to protect the ATM network, especially in rural communities and areas already affected by previous and proposed bank branch closures, where ATMs provides a lifeline service to consumers and small businesses.
“There needs to be a long-term, sustainable banking service for all communities and the Scottish Government will continue to work with banks to ensure that essential services remain accessible to all.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel