The Scottish Government intends to bring forward new legislation to ensure Scots law continues to align with EU rules post-Brexit after it abandoned its Continuity Bill.
Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell has said he wants to develop legislation to make sure there is “no regression in standards or protections” in areas including environmental protection and human rights.
It comes almost four months after the UK Supreme Court ruled the Scottish Government’s Continuity Bill could not be legally introduced.
The previous legislation was brought forward amid fears the UK Government’s European Withdrawal Act would be a “power grab”, with responsibilities the Scottish Government believe should come to Holyrood instead going to Westminster after Brexit.
In December, Supreme Court president Lady Hale ruled the Continuity Bill was within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament in all but one area when it was passed because it did not relate to reserved matters.
But the Bill, which received the backing of the Scottish Parliament, was superseded when the UK Government passed its EU Withdrawal Bill.
In a letter to the Scottish Parliament’s Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh, Mr Russell wrote: “The extent to which devolved law aligns itself with the law of the EU should be a decision for the Scottish Parliament to take, not the UK Government.
“This Government is committed to no regression in standards or protections should EU exit take place, and the replacement of regulatory powers lost in consequence of EU exit will be essential to ensure that.”
Commenting on the Supreme Court’s decision to rule the Bill was unlawful, Mr Russell warned it had “profound implications on devolution”.
“The court held that when the Scottish Parliament passed the Continuity Bill it had the power to decide what should be done, in devolved Scots law, to protect our system of laws from the damaging consequences of EU exit,” he wrote.
“That power was removed by the UK Government’s EU (Withdrawal) Act, an Act passed without the consent of the Scottish Parliament.”
Scottish Greens parliamentary co-Leader Patrick Harvie said: “The Scottish Parliament has been shown contempt by the UK Government and the people of Scotland should not be expected to roll over and accept this.
“If Brexit ultimately goes ahead, the UK’s determination to overrule our stronger approach to environmental governance must not be accepted.”
He added: “The Scottish Government is under pressure to introduce a strong new Environment Bill, replacing EU environment functions and building on those protections rather than letting the UK undermine them further.
“The SNP have still not given that clear commitment and we will keep them under pressure to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel