BRITAIN must produce a “credible and realistic way forward” to have a chance of getting a further delay to Brexit, Ireland’s Leo Varadkar has warned, as the Con-Lab talks to find a workable compromise are set to stretch into a third day.
On Thursday evening following four and a half hours of talks, Theresa May met with an inner circle of senior ministers to take stock of the inter-party discussions with a suggestion that a run-off vote on various Brexit options should include a confirmatory referendum on any agreed deal.
Those present at the Downing St meeting were thought to include: Philip Hammond, the Chancellor; David Lidington, the Prime Minister’s de facto deputy; Stephen Barclay, the Brexit Secretary, and Michael Gove, the Environment Secretary, as well as Geoffrey Cox, the Attorney General.
Speaking in Dublin after her talks with the Taoiseach, Angela Merkel insisted: “Until the very last hour - I can say this from the German side - we will do everything to prevent a no-deal Brexit.”
The German Chancellor added: "We will simply have to be able to do this. We have to be successful and we hope for a solution that we can agree with Britain.
"I heard that you have the same saying as what we say in Germany: 'Where there's a will, there's a way.'”
Mrs May has made clear she will seek a further extension beyond the rescheduled exit day of April 12 when she travels to Brussels next Wednesday for a special EU summit.
However, EU leaders like Mr Varadkar have made clear they need to see a concrete proposal from Britain to justify putting off exit day for another period of time.
"Matters continue to play out in London and we need to be patient and understanding of the predicament that they are in,” the Irish Prime Minister acknowledged. Yet he added: "But of course, any further extension must require and must have a credible and realistic way forward."
At present, that does not exist.
The Con-Lab talks in the Cabinet Office between Mrs May’s team and Jeremy Corbyn’s to break the Brexit logjam were “productive,” said No 10, but it was reticent about giving away any details about subject matter discussed or any progress made.
It said both sides hoped to meet again on Friday “for further work to find a way forward to deliver on the referendum, mindful of the need to make progress ahead of the forthcoming European Council”.
Labour was even more tight-lipped, saying only that the talks had taken place, they were continuing and the “teams are planning to meet again".
On Tuesday, when the PM made her announcement to “break the logjam,” she said if the Con-Lab talks failed to agree on a single unified approach, then she would offer a run-off vote between a number of options for the Future Relationship. Crucially, Mrs May made clear the Government would abide by the Commons’ decision but, to make the process work, so too would the Opposition.
Since UK ministers failed to lay a parliamentary motion on Thursday, this means there will be no Brexit run-off vote on Monday, should the talks break down.
Given Donald Tusk, the European Council President, has made clear he needs as much advance warning as possible ahead of Wednesday’s summit, then it seems clear any run-off vote would take place on Tuesday.
However, Downing St said it was a matter for the EU27 to determine “what they are seeking from the UK” but the expectation was they would want “clarity on the way forward in the UK Parliament on how we are going to ratify the deal and exit the EU as soon as possible”.
Asked if “clarity” meant a Commons vote, the PM’s spokesman referred back to Mrs May’s statement earlier in the week, adding: “I am genuinely not in a position to say definitively what the position will be on Tuesday.”
Senior Government insiders posited the possibility that the PM could go to Brussels next week while talks with Labour were continuing without any votes having taken place. Yet this would raise doubts about whether the EU27 would be willing to offer any extension in such circumstances.
Earlier, Mr Barclay, in a warning echoed by Downing St, told MPs the Bill promoted by Labour’s Yvette Cooper, designed to stop the UK crashing out of the EU next week, had created the danger of an "accidental no-deal Brexit".
The Brexit Secretary claimed the measure could backfire if the Commons rejected any Brexit delay offered by EU leaders at next Wednesday’s summit as there would be no time to renegotiate it before the deadline for departure two days later on Friday.
*Downing St last night announced six ministerial replacements for those who resigned over the Government’s Brexit policy. Among them is James Cleverley, the Tory Deputy Chairman, who becomes a junior minister at the Department for Exiting the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel