Remaining in the EU is still “firmly on the table” after MPs failed to back any of the Brexit options presented to them, the SNP’s Westminster leader has said.
Ian Blackford said that Parliament has now resoundingly rejected leaving the EU either with Theresa May’s deal or with no deal.
All the proposals put forward for “indicative” votes were rejected at Westminster on Wednesday evening, although the process indicated significant support for a second referendum and a customs union.
READ MORE: Brexit chaos continues as Theresa May offers to stand down
The Revoke Article 50 to avoid no deal motion tabled by SNP MP Joanna Cherry was defeated by 293 votes to 184, a majority of 109.
If Brexit ends up being forced through on the basis of a deal no one supports – indeed a deal so bad that the PM has to promise to resign to get it through – it will make an already bad project even worse.
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) March 27, 2019
Mr Blackford said that Scotland has been ignored throughout the Brexit process and that the only way to protect the country’s interests is with independence.
He said on Wednesday: “The SNP used our votes tonight to protect Scotland’s place in the EU, and to reject any proposal that would drive us out.
“Parliament has resoundingly rejected leaving the EU with Theresa May’s bad deal, with no-deal, and under other hard Brexit options.
“It is clear that remaining in the EU is an option that is firmly on the table – with a second EU referendum being the most popular option of all, and a substantial number of MPs recognising that revoking Article 50 is the right way to prevent a Brexit disaster.
“Parliament has taken initial steps towards building consensus. In the coming days, we will continue cross-party discussions to find a way forward – including whether proposals on the single market and customs union, which currently fall short, can be strengthened.”
READ MORE: ‘Herculean, selfless, inglorious’: What the papers say on Theresa May's vow to step down
He added: “Scotland has been ignored throughout the Brexit process. We did not vote for Brexit and we should not be dragged out of the EU against our will.
“Whatever happens now, it is clear that the only way to properly protect our interests is with independence.”
Paul Sweeney, Labour MP for Glasgow North East, tweeted: “We stand against a damaging Tory Brexit and catastrophic no deal. A consensus could potentially be constructed on possible deals from Monday onwards but it is crucial the British people have the final say in a confirmatory vote.”
Earlier on Wednesday, Theresa May said she will stand down as Prime Minister before the next phase of Brexit negotiations.
(PA Graphics)
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Brexit ends up being forced through on the basis of a deal that no-one supports, it will “make an already bad project even worse.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Scotland 'is being shortchanged' over Brexit negotiations
She said: “For Scotland, this raises the prospect of being shackled to a disastrous Brexit driven by a Tory party lurching even further to the right, with a Brexiteer PM in charge – further reinforcing the case for our country taking its future into its own hands.”
Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said: “The results of the process this House has gone through today strengthens our view that the deal the Government has negotiated is the best option.
“It is the Government’s firm wish to get the Withdrawal Agreement approved by this House, and I urge all members, no matter the view on what the future relationship should be, if you believe in delivering on the referendum result by leaving the EU with a deal, then it’s necessary to back the Withdrawal Agreement.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel