The director of the official Leave campaign Dominic Cummings has been found to be in contempt of Parliament after he failed to appear before MPs investigating fake news.
The Commons Privileges Committee said Mr Cummings’ refusal to give oral evidence constituted a “significant interference” in the work of the inquiry.
However it acknowledged its sanctions were limited to recommending the Commons issue a formal “admonishment” for his conduct, raising questions about its enforcement powers.
READ MORE: Brexit latest: MPs prepare for indicative votes
The admonishment would require a resolution of the House which, if passed, “should be communicated to Mr Cummings by the Clerk of the House”, the committee said in its report.
The MP leading the fake news inquiry – Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee chairman Damian Collins – said it was clear the powers of the House had been “found wanting”.
He said Mr Cummings – the director of the Vote Leave campaign spearheaded by Boris Johnson – had shown a “total disregard” for the authority of Parliament and called for statutory powers to “reassert the authority that is missing”.
“The Dominic Cummings case highlights the need for Parliament to define in law what its powers should be to require witnesses to attend hearings, and what sanctions should apply if they do not,” he said.
“The current powers have been tested to their limits and found wanting.”
READ MORE: TV review: Brexit: The Uncivil War. Infamy, infamy!
The Privileges Committee said the case “raised further questions about the enforceability of the House’s powers and those of its committees to secure evidence” and that it would be resuming an inquiry into the matter.
The case was referred to the committee in June last year after Mr Cummings – who was played by Benedict Cumberbatch in a recent Channel 4 TV drama – failed to respond to an order of the House requiring him to give an undertaking to appear before the inquiry by a specified date.
In launching its inquiry the committee noted the House had previously decided that its “penal jurisdiction” should be exercised as “sparingly as possible” and said it would not recommend the use of any “power of committal to prison” in this case.
The report concluded Mr Cummings committed a contempt “both by his initial refusal to obey the DCMS Committee’s order to attend it and by his subsequent refusal to obey the House’s order of June 7”.
It also expressed “regret” for the “tone” adopted by Mr Cummings in his dealings with the DCMS Committee and in comments posted on his blog, including accusations of “grandstanding” and “spreading errors and lies”.
“This attitude did not serve the interests of civilised public debate,” the report said.
“We have no doubt that, had Mr Cummings attended a hearing of the DCMS Committee, he would have given robust and articulate responses to the questions put to him, and would have had no difficulty in communicating his standpoint to the public and the media.
“Attending the hearing and defending his position when called upon to do so would have been the right thing to do.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel