Theresa May is seeking a short Brexit delay amid suggestions of a Tory backlash if the Government requested a longer extension of EU membership.
In a letter to European Council president Donald Tusk on Wednesday, the Prime Minister is believed to be asking for a three-month extension to June 30 in the hope of securing approval from MPs for her Withdrawal Agreement.
READ MORE: Letters: Let us have a lengthy Brexit delay, then a people's vote
A Number 10 source said: “PM won’t be asking for a long extension.
“There is a case for giving Parliament a bit more time to agree a way forward, but the people of this country have been waiting nearly three years now.
“They are fed up with Parliament’s failure to take a decision and the PM shares their frustration.”
READ MORE: Theresa May 'determined' that MPs should have another chance to vote on her Brexit deal
Mrs May’s move comes exactly 1,000 days after the referendum of June 23 2016, which delivered a 52%-48% majority for leaving the EU.
It will dismay hardline Leavers still hoping for a no-deal “clean Brexit” on the scheduled withdrawal date of March 29.
Tory tensions came to the fore at a fractious Cabinet discussion of the planned letter on Tuesday.
Any request for extra time is subject to unanimous approval by leaders of the remaining 27 EU states at a meeting in Brussels on Thursday.
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker said he had not received Mrs May’s letter, but was hoping for “clarity” from the UK on the way forward.
He suggested that agreement on an extension to Article 50 might not be reached at this week’s European Council summit, and that EU leaders might have to meet again next week to finalise it.
Speaking to German radio station DRF, Mr Juncker said: “We will probably have to meet again next week, because Mrs May has not got agreement for anything either in her Cabinet or her Parliament.
“As long as we don’t know what Great Britain will say Yes to, we can’t come to a resolution.”
Mr Juncker said the EU had already moved a long way to accommodate the UK’s demands, and there would be “no more negotiations”.
READ MORE: What the papers say after John Bercow rules out third vote on Theresa May's deal
“I am ready for any movement, but we have already moved intensively towards Britain,” he said, adding: “There isn’t any more.”
Asked about indications from Downing Street that Mrs May will request a short extension, Mr Juncker told DRF: “Those months would have to produce, as an end result, an agreement from the British Parliament to the (Agreement) text which is before them.
“If that doesn’t happen, and if Great Britain does not leave at the end of March, then we are, I am sorry to say, in the hands of God. And I think even God sometimes reaches a limit to his patience.”
Asked if the EU would then rule out any further compromise, Mr Juncker said: “We are not in a state of war with the UK, but a state of negotiation. But the negotiations are finished.”
Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom said the PM is “extremely frustrated” but “remains determined to take us out of the EU” and hopes to do so without participating in EU elections.
She told LBC: “It’s absolutely essential we’re out of the EU before the European elections.
“It would be extraordinary for the people who voted to leave the EU to find us fielding candidates for these next elections.
“She’s absolutely working her socks off to get to that point so, in seeking a short extension, she and her Cabinet will be determined to get further progress on the meaningful vote so we can get her deal voted through in Parliament.”
Mrs Leadsom is understood to have told fellow ministers on Tuesday: “This used to be the Cabinet that would deliver Brexit and now, from what I’m hearing, it’s not.”
Education Secretary Damian Hinds said a short extension was the right choice.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I don’t see how a long delay gives certainty, actually, we’ve had a long time already.
“Unless and until a deal is finalised, there remains the prospect, the risk, of no deal.
“In terms of timing there has already been two-plus years to do this and I think people are a bit tired of waiting for Parliament to get our act together and get the deal passed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel