Chemicals tycoon John White is the polluter who never paid. He left a toxic legacy of poisoned land and ruined lives across the west of Scotland.
His reward was a seat in the House of Lords as Baron Overtoun and a park in his name.
This month The Herald has revealed that Clydeside authorities do not have £54 million needed to clean up the most concentrated patch of contamination left by White’s long-gone business empire.
READ MORE: Toxic land poses 'immediate and long-term risk to public health'
Waste dumped by his firm, J&J White Chemicals, now presents an “immediate and long-term threat to public health”, according to documents we revealed and published yesterday. It has left underground rivers running jungle green pouring cancer-causing chromium-VI in to the River Clyde after rainfall.
White died in 1908. His family’s factory, at Shawfield – the site needing regenerated – closed in 1967 after various corporate incarnations.
The public purse is left facing his bills.
Now, some residents are asking whether the main green space in Rutherglen – which White donated to the burgh – should keep his noble name, Overtoun Park. The town’s MP, Ged Killen, has suggested the founder of the Scottish Labour movement should be honoured instead.
Mr Killen said: “I have been saying for some time that Hardie Park would be a more suitable name, given Keir Hardie’s involvement in trying to secure better working conditions and rights for White’s factory workers. But I realise people may have grown attached to the name and there may be little enthusiasm to change it.
READ MORE: Polmadie burn, Glasgow sealed off over dangerous levels of cancer-causing chromium
“It’s hard to imagine if we were naming a beautiful park such as Overtoun today we would choose the name of a man directly connected with the contamination of land across the local area.
“I think it would be nice if, at the very least, we could find some way to mark the contribution of the workers who put their lives at risk earning Lord Overtoun his fortune.”
Mr Killen, who represents Labour, has joined politicians from other parties, including the Glasgow Central
SNP MP Alison Thewliss, and list MSPs Patrick Harvie of the Greens and Adam Tompkins of the Conservatives, to call for a clean-up of Shawfield.
Mr Killen said: “The most important thing is that we get a firm commitment from every level of government that investment will be brought forward and the process of remediating the remaining contaminated land and bringing it back into economic use can be expedited.”
It was Hardie, as a campaigning journalist in his newspaper Labour Leader, who first highlighted the fate of those he called “White Slaves”, the workers at the Shawfield site who suffered horrendous health problems, including the loss of their noses from the chromium.
READ MORE: Fresh pressure over Polmadie Burn
Hardie’s campaign enraged White, who was a Liberal and a philanthropist who supported numerous good causes, including Glasgow’s Hospital For Sick Children. The Labour man exposed White’s hypocrisy
Labour historian and campaigner Blair McDougall explained: “White was very, very pious and a strong Sabbatarian who helped stop trams running on a Sunday, yet his own works were always open on a Sunday and his men were wading about in pots of chromium.
“The chemical ate away the cartilage in their noses, so much so they would eventually fall off. All over the south of the river there were men with hankies over their bloodied noses.”
White tried to stop Hardie’s reporting, sparking correspondence for and against his business in this newspaper, the then Glasgow Herald.
Mr McDougall said: “There were all these stories about how Overtoun’s health had been affected by this persecution by this terrible man. Eventually, Overtoun realised his public reputation was being damaged and gave his workers Sunday off and improved conditions.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here