John Bercow comes under close scrutiny in the national newspapers as they give their views on his ruling over another vote on Theresa May's Brexit deal.
The Commons Speaker scuppered the chance of another Commons vote on the Prime Minister's deal before Thursday's EU summit, ruling that she could not bring her EU Withdrawal Agreement back before MPs unless it was substantially different from the package that was defeated last week.
READ MORE: Speaker John Bercow thwarts third vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal without ‘substantial’ changes
The Daily Mail leads the criticism of Mr Bercow, branding his decision an "act of sabotage".
It attacks the Speaker for what it calls "anti-Brexit prejudice", and says losing the chance to back Mrs May's deal would be "a perversion of our democracy".
EXPRESS: The Brexit Destroyer #tomorrowspaperstoday pic.twitter.com/ehhxLkasC5
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) March 18, 2019
"Although he claims his decision is based on 'strong and longstanding convention', several constitutional experts - including ex-Commons clerk Sir David Natzler and former Parliamentary Counsel Sir Stephen Laws - say it is wrong in principle as well as in spirit," the paper writes.
"They say he is wrong to obstruct the vital business of government in this way and wrong to frustrate the House in its search for compromise."
The Daily Express takes a similarly firm stance, running with the headline "The Brexit Destroyer" on its front page.
In its leader, the paper says Mr Bercow's ruling was a "wholly unwelcome surprise".
"Although Bercow's ambush will please certain No Deal advocates and other enemies of Theresa May, it has rightfully caused anger in Westminster and across the country, frustrating a plan that was starting to hold," it says.
"Mrs May will now likely seek an extension from the EU, but Bercow's political vanity has sent a wrecking ball crashing into the most important political process in decades."
The Sun also criticises Mr Bercow for the ruling, and says a third vote is "arguably in the public interest".
"Our entire future is in the balance," it warns.
Meanwhile, The Times says the Government's Brexit strategy was further blown apart by Mr Bercow's announcement.
MAIL: Smirk that says: Brexit be damned #tomorrowspaperstoday pic.twitter.com/vO3x2udXlZ
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) March 18, 2019
But that strategy appeared to have "run out of road" even before his intervention, it adds.
READ MORE: Hundreds of Scottish police officers on standby for Brexit
It suggests Mr Bercow had "succeeded in doing something that has until now proved impossible: he has managed to unite both sides of the Brexit divide".
"Brexiteers cheered his ruling because they believe he has breathed new life into the possibility of no deal... Pro-Europeans, on the other hand, are delighted because they believe that the prime minister will have to seek a long extension to Article 50," it says.
The paper's leader adds: "The best option is for parliament to back Mrs May's deal in a vote next week.
"The question is whether both sides can come up with something that would meet Mr Bercow's definition of substantive change, allowing a fresh vote to take place. Time is impossibly short. The stakes could not be higher."
"More drama lies ahead", warns the Daily Telegraph, as it says Mr Bercow's intervention gave the Brexit plot "yet another twist".
"As things stand, though, Mrs May's deal is effectively dead and the UK is leaving the EU next week," it adds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel