A LABOUR frontbencher has been criticised after he said MPs who quit to join the Independent Group were part of a “necessary cleansing” of the party.
Paul Sweeney, the shadow Scotland Office minister, accused former colleagues Chris Leslie and Chuka Umunna – who left labour to join the new pro-EU grouping, which also includes ex-Tories – of being “self-centred careerists”.
He also branded Mr Leslie “aloof and arrogant”, according to the Morning Star newspaper, adding: “The venom and the vitriol with which he addressed our front bench was a disgrace.”
Mr Sweeney, who represents Glasgow North East, reportedly made the comments at a meeting which took place on Friday night to mark the relaunch of the left-wing Tribune magazine.
He said: “There’s a necessary cleansing that has to happen in the margins.”
However, he expressed regret that Luciana Berger, the MP for Liverpoor Wavertree, had left the party amid accusations of bullying and bigotry centred around anti-Semitism.
Mr Sweeney later said his phrasing had been a “clumsy choice of words”, adding: “I meant no offence and apologise for any offence inadvertently caused on my part.”
Former Labour MP Ian Austin, who quit the party last month but did not join the new Independent Group, condemned the comments on Twitter.
He wrote: “A Labour MP says that people who have left Labour because of racism and extremism is a ‘necessary cleansing’.
“Let’s think about this: @pauljsweeney thinks the party is cleaner because people appalled about racism have left.”
One Labour MP told the PoliticsHome website: “Jeremy Corbyn has an opportunity here to show that he is serious about dealing with anti-Semitism and bullying in the Labour Party by sacking Sweeney from his shadow ministerial role and stripping him of the Labour whip.
"Anything less than that will be viewed as more prevarication on this issue.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here