Lecturers have passed a no confidence vote on the umbrella body for the college sector in Scotland.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) said members at the union’s Further Education Lecturers’ Association (FELA) annual general meeting unanimously voted to pass the vote of no confidence in Colleges Scotland.
A number of one-day strikes have taken place recently, in a long-running dispute, as the union demands a “fair cost of living increase”, in line with public sector pay policy.
The union rejected a 2% increase offer over three years, and accused employers’ association Colleges Scotland of seeking to tear up existing commitments on lecturers’ working conditions.
EIS-FELA president Pam Currie said: “Colleges Scotland are misrepresenting the figures related to this dispute, and it is now time for the Scottish Government to step in and act.
“We have been very clear to management that we are asking only for a fair cost of living pay increase, in line with public sector pay policy.
“We are not being unreasonable or greedy, as the management have often claimed.
“Essentially, this dispute is about college management attempting to wriggle out of existing agreements delivered through national bargaining.
“We are very clear that we are not going to sell anyone’s hard-won terms and conditions to achieve a fair cost of living pay increase.”
The union also launched a Parliamentary Briefing, which has been sent to all MSPs, “setting out the facts in relation to the dispute”.
The briefing states: “Colleges Scotland has presented financial information to the Scottish Parliament about the EIS-FELA pay dispute.
“In making its argument that the EIS-FELA pay claim is unaffordable and unreasonable, it has relied upon its own costings of the pay harmonisation process, of the EIS-FELA pay claims and of the settlement for support staff.
“It has sought to add credibility to its briefing by citing the validation of these costings by the SFC (Scottish Funding Council).
“The EIS believes that these costings are misleading and do not accurately reflect the true costs to the sector as purported.”
John Gribben, director of Employment Services at the Colleges Scotland Employers’ Association, was critical of the move.
He said: “The EIS-FELA’s refusal to make any compromises or meaningfully negotiate is the greatest threat facing the college sector, and they are committed to the disgraceful tactic of withholding assessment results from colleges.
“This is recklessly gambling with students’ futures as they will not be able to finalise apprenticeships, move on to other courses at college or university, or receive certificates required for starting jobs.
“It is not the behaviour of serious educational professionals who care about our students.
“The EIS-FELA has gone out on strike for the third time in four years – without ever formally putting any of our offers to their members – after rejecting an overall national average pay increase of £5,000, or more than 12%, over a three-year period, and lecturers have the most enviable terms and conditions in Scotland’s public sector, including 62 days’ holiday a year, a reduction in class contact time to 23 hours per week, excellent pensions, and a commitment from colleges to pay for those lecturers without formal teaching qualifications to gain TQFEs (Teaching Qualification Further Education) within existing working hours.”
Further Education Minister Richard Lochhead said: “This is a disappointing development given recent constructive dialogue and encouraging signs of progress in recent months with the Employers’ Association tabling a revised offer.
“The current dispute concerns cost of living pay uplift over and above the additional costs of harmonisation of pay, terms and conditions.
“The Scottish Government is funding the additional costs of this harmonisation, which is helping colleges deliver an average 9% pay increase to lecturers over three years.
“The only way to resolve the dispute is for the parties to continue engaging in respectful dialogue and negotiation. Escalation to industrial action would not be in anyone’s interests, least of all students.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel