Campaigners against smoking and poverty have joined together to call for smokers to be given “alternative coping strategies” when quitting cigarettes.
Research by the Poverty Alliance and Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) Scotland found people in poverty are more likely to smoke because they are at greater risk of stress and less likely to have access to alternative coping mechanisms.
Ash Scotland chief executive Sheila Duffy said: “We know only too well the harm caused by smoking, and that most people who smoke say that they want to stop.
“But we need to listen to the voices of people affected by smoking, so that health campaigns and support services can be better tailored to the needs, experiences and perceptions of the people affected.
“People who smoke don’t want to be told what to do, but they don’t want the harm and costs that come with smoking either.
“By understanding each other and working together, health and anti-poverty groups will be better placed to learn what really works.”
A report by the two organisations makes a series of recommendations, including doing more than “just calling on people to stop smoking” by supporting them to find alternative coping strategies.
Further recommendations are for more positive messages encouraging smokers to quit, with the “emphasis on supporting people rather than on taking something away”.
The organisations want strategies to tackle smoking and poverty and for better collaboration between health and anti-poverty groups.
Poverty Alliance director Peter Kelly added: “People living in poverty face pressures that restricts choices and leaves them feeling little sense of control.
“Whilst a minority of people living in places affected by poverty actually smoke, the health and financial impacts fall disproportionately on them.
“There is a need to recognise that smoking is a burden on people living in poverty, not a support – but in responding to that we need to understand the context in which people are living, and listen to the voices of people living in poverty talking of the valid needs and wishes they are looking to address.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel