THE Scottish Secretary has been forced to defend himself after defying Theresa May and abstaining on a crucial vote ruling out a no-deal Brexit under any circumstances.
David Mundell indicated he would not resign despite flouting Government orders – and insisted the Prime Minister had his “full support”.
READ MORE: Brexit and Theresa May on the brink after MPs revolt over no deal
It came after MPs rejected a no-deal Brexit under any circumstances by a majority of 43 votes following the crushing defeat of Mrs May’s Withdrawal Agreement on Tuesday.
The Government tabled a motion to prevent the UK leaving the EU on March 29 without a deal.
But before this was voted on, an amendment initially backed by Tory MP Caroline Spelman – which ruled out exiting the EU without a deal at any point – was passed by just four votes.
The Government then ordered Tory MPs to vote against its own motion, but were defeated by 321 votes to 278 – with four cabinet ministers, including Mr Mundell, abstaining.
He later tweeted: “I’ve always opposed a no-deal Brexit. The House made its view clear by agreeing the Spelman amendment, I didn’t think it was right for me to oppose that.
“The PM has my full support in her objective of leaving the EU with a deal to deliver an orderly Brexit.”
Sources said he did not have to quit as he had not voted against the Government.
But SNP MP Drew Hendry insisted Mr Mundell must resign as he had “proved himself utterly incapable of standing up for Scotland’s interests”.
He said it was “shameful” most Scottish Tory MPs had voted with the Government to reject ruling out a no-deal exit.
Meanwhile, shadow Scottish secretary Lesley Laird accused Mr Mundell of an “absolute abdication of duty”.
She said: “David Mundell proclaimed that he would vote to take no-deal off of the table but he appears to have caved under pressure.
READ MORE: David Mundell forced to defend himself after defying Government on no-deal Brexit vote
“No-deal is an economic and social calamity for our country. If he is not sacked, he should resign for the simple reason that his party thought it was a good idea to inflict that on the Scottish people.”
Mr Mundell previously insisted he would do “whatever I deem necessary” to stop a no-deal Brexit.
Elsewhere, Scottish Tory MP Paul Masterton, who represents East Renfrewshire, was among those to vote against the Government.
The SNP insisted Brexit should be delayed long enough to hold another referendum on EU membership following the UK Government’s descent into “total chaos”.
Westminster leader Ian Blackford said Theresa May must now extend or revoke Article 50 – and “put the decision back to the people”.
He said: “The UK Government has descended into total chaos. Theresa May has lost control. That means it’s time to put the decision on our EU membership back to the people.
“Parliament has now resoundingly rejected Theresa May’s deal and leaving with no deal.
“Only a fresh referendum can now unblock things. The UK government must now extend or revoke Article 50, and set into motion plans to hold a second EU referendum – with Remain on the ballot paper.
“Staying in the EU is the best deal of all. It’s what Scotland and Northern Ireland voted for, and it’s the only way to protect jobs, living standards, our public services and the economy.
“Holding a second EU referendum is the best and most democratic way out of the impasse at Westminster. The UK government has failed and the people must now have their say.
“Scotland did not vote for Brexit and we should not be dragged out of the EU against our will. And the way Scotland has been ignored throughout the Brexit process means the case for independence is now stronger than it has ever been.”
Kerry Buist, director of Scotland for a People’s Vote, welcomed the result. She added: “There is only one way forward in these circumstances – to hand the final decision back to the public through a People’s Vote.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel