Last Friday, Shamima Begum’s baby boy Jerrah was buried at the age of 18 days old. He died from pneumonia after enduring freezing conditions without any heating in a Syrian refugee camp.
A woman journalist who met Shamima and her baby in the camp said: “They haven’t got any form of heating… at night… she was freezing cold and was worried about Jarrah becoming sick.”
Jarrah’s teenage mother remains stateless, grieving alone for her third dead child, in a refugee camp surrounded by other foreign ISIS supporters at an undisclosed location. International Rescue estimates that at least 80 more children of foreign fighters have also died in the camps.
Before her case was highlighted in the press, more than 400 ISIS supporters were allowed into the UK, briefly questioned before going home to their families. The fact that she spoke to a visiting Times journalist searching for her and the other Bethnal Green girls worked against her, as one journalist after another sought her out for sound bites to feed the public outrage.
Begum said all along she was speaking out to save her baby’s life. Entirely alone, she was not prepared for the media. She never came forward of her own volition. She pleaded for the Home Secretary to let her and her baby come home until she realised there was no point and retreated silently to her UNHCR tent. Within her context of an unsafe refugee camp, what she could say was very limited. Yet the clumsy words she did offer were leapt upon as evidence of her supposedly inherent evil. But what does the public care about context? A lot of hate was targeted at this brown, Muslim teenager who made a catastrophic mistake by believing a lie.
When a couple weeks later, a polite English born ISIS-supporting white man, also stuck in Syria, was interviewed, and spoke limply with a pathetic smile of missing his mother and Greggs sausage rolls, there was barely a murmur in comparison. He retains his citizenship.
Shamima Begum was groomed and brainwashed online at the age of 15, fed dreams of the perfect Islamic life via YouTube. (Same as this country was fed lies that they believed about £350M on the side of a bus and some of the mainstream media repeated those lies without proper fact checking). Within TEN days of arriving in Syria, she was married and then spent most of her time in Syria being pregnant and living what she called a “normal” life.
Five other girls from Bethnal Green Academy were also targeted by ISIS. The school knew that female pupils were being targeted yet failed to explain the seriousness of the situation to the parents or what an appropriate adult meant when they assumed that role. This was a catastrophic failure in safeguarding. Khadiza Sultana died in Syria in 2016 yet her death failed to trigger a serious case review by Tower Hamlets Council.
In 2015, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe admitted to a Home Affairs Select Committee that blunders by police and their school meant that the families of the Bethnal Green girls were completely unaware that they were being actively groomed by ISIS to leave Britain and go to Syria.
To date, there has been no independent review, nothing to suggest that lessons have been learned or that safeguards have been put in place to ever stop this happening again. Tower Hamlets Council has failed to conduct a Serious Case Review. None of the other families affected have ever been contacted as part of a formal inquiry to establish how Shamima Begum and the other girls ended up in Syria.
Mark Rowley, Anti terror chief of Metropolitan Police also stated that they were victims because they were indoctrinated online as children and would be allowed to return home to their families provided they committed no crimes.
This country knew this child was communicating with extremists before she left the UK and did nothing.Yet the current Home Secretary took no notice of their views or Shamima’s pleas.
Appealing to the populist vote, he made an example of her, took her British citizenship away, rendering her stateless, in contravention of International law, while simultaneously letting over 400 predominantly male ISIS returnees in to this country on the quiet. In this, Javid surpassed even Theresa May, then Home Secretary, architect of the racist hostile environment, who in 2014 said "it is illegal for any country to make its citizens stateless".
In the process of stripping Begum of her citizenship, Sajid Javid sent a clear message to every British born child of immigrants that our passports are nothing more than visas, and we are effectively second class citizens. What terror threat does Shamima Begum pose? None whatsoever and the Home Secretary well knows it. But this traumatised teenager with no legal representation of her own was made into a monster beyond the capability of our own legal process. Shamima Begum is Britain’s problem, not Syria’s, a problem created in the context of an illegal war against Iraq, which this country was prewarned about. Think David Kelly and Chilcott.
There is a high probability that Shamima’s baby would have lived had he and his mother been allowed to return. Jarrah has now paid the price for our Home Secretary’s political opportunism.
As for Shamima, she has more than paid the price for a catastrophic mistake she made at the age of 15. After all, what greater price can there be than to have three babies die in front of your eyes, your two best friends either killed or missing, then be rendered stateless in the eyes of the world, away from the only family who love you enough to want you back home to recover, whatever your error.
If ever there was a time for this traumatised British teenager to be allowed home it is now. If Sajid Javid has an ounce of compassion, or any remorse, he will forget about dog whistle politics and let her. If not, let him face his own public humiliation in the courts , and a costly tax payer funded battle when - not if - she gets her citizenship handed back to her, once due process prevails.
Robina Qureshi, Human Rights Campaigner
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article