From the craggy peaks of its tallest mountains to the tranquil waters of its lowest lochs, Scotland is rightly proud of its stunning natural landscape.
But with the advent of climate change and ever-growing threats to the environment, there are fears some of the country’s greatest natural treasures are at risk.
Now an ambitious new initiative aims to pump £1 billion into Scotland’s environmental assets, by encouraging public bodies, private firms and non-profit entities to invest in schemes such as planting native woodlands and restoring oyster reefs.
It’s a sophisticated vision based on a simple premise: that investing in nature can generate substantial returns.
Jo Pike, deputy chief executive of the Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT), said there was “a growing awareness that investing in nature-based solutions can help us solve some of the biggest problems we’ve got”.
Meanwhile, there is an emerging realisation that “the loss of species, the loss of biodiversity, is equally serious”.
“With that backdrop, we’ve got urgency there,” Ms Pike added.
The £1 Billion Challenge, or Scottish Conservation Finance Project, is being led by SWT and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) and aims to drive investment into Scotland’s natural assets in ways which will deliver significant environmental, social and economic benefits.
The idea is that investors provide a chunk of cash up front to finance ambitious environmental schemes, on the understanding that they will make money in the long term.
Those who stand to directly benefit will then pay smaller amounts into the project over a period of time, creating a profit for investors.
Ms Pike explains: “The investors provide the upfront money, and then over time they’re paid back from that cash flow that you’ve secured, negotiated from the people who are going to directly benefit from improved water quality or better flood protection.”
Housebuilders and insurance companies, for example, could pay towards planting woodlands and restoring wetlands in order to reduce the risk of flooding.
A similar scheme in the US called the Forest Resilience Bond, which experts in Scotland are learning from, uses private capital to finance forest restoration in an effort to prevent devastating wildfires, such as those which swept through California last year.
Ms Pike gave the example of two particular projects which are being examined in Scotland.
The first would see a vast network of riparian woodlands – or riverbank woodlands – planted throughout the country to help boost biodiversity and protect against flooding. This would also reduce water temperatures, which could be of financial interest to Scotland’s booming whisky industry.
Meanwhile, plans are also being drawn up to transform vacant and derelict land across towns and cities.
Ms Pike said there was “more and more research” highlighting the financial benefits created by urban green spaces for health alone.
She said the £1 Billion Challenge was at the “cutting-edge” of global ideas about how to tackle environmental threats, and pointed to recent research showing almost one in five British mammal species faces a high risk of extinction.
The Scottish Conservation Finance Project has been shaped by a range of organisations including Virgin Money, Scottish Natural Heritage, Crown Estate Scotland, Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Scottish Water.
John Rowan, former group treasurer of Virgin Money, said it should offer “a variety of sustainable investment opportunities”, offering “good diversification opportunities”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel