Theresa May was forced into promising MPs a vote on extending Brexit negotiations or withdrawing from the EU without a deal if her plan is rejected next month.
Mrs May confirmed that she will put her Withdrawal Agreement, including whatever additional assurances she has secured from Brussels, to a "meaningful vote" by March 12.
If that fails, MPs will be offered two separate votes on the following days - one on a no-deal Brexit and, if that is defeated, the other on requesting an extension to the two-year Article 50 negotiation process to delay EU withdrawal beyond March 29.
Read more: Brexit fallout live
The sequence of votes will be proposed in an amendable motion tabled by the Prime Minister for debate and vote in the Commons on Wednesday.
To uproar in the Commons, Mrs May told MPs: "They are commitments I am making as Prime Minister and I will stick by them, as I have previous commitments to make statements and table amendable motions by specific dates."
But she added: "Let me be clear, I do not want to see Article 50 extended. Our absolute focus should be on working to get a deal and leaving on March 29."
Read more: Jeremy Corbyn moves to back second EU poll - with Remain on ballot paper
In a statement to MPs following a Cabinet meeting with senior colleagues at 10 Downing Street, Theresa May said she wanted to set out "three further commitments" to the Commons.
She said: "First, we will hold a second meaningful vote by Tuesday March 12 at the latest.
"Second, if the Government has not won a meaningful vote by Tuesday March 12, then it will - in addition to its obligations to table a neutral amendable motion under Section 13 of the EU Withdrawal Act - table a motion to be voted on by Wednesday March 13 at the latest, asking this House if it supports leaving the EU without a Withdrawal Agreement and a framework for a future relationship on March 29.
"So the United Kingdom will only leave without a deal on March 29 if there is explicit consent in the House for that outcome.
"Third, if the House, having rejected the deal negotiated with the EU, then rejects leaving on March 29 without a Withdrawal Agreement and future framework, the Government will on March 14 bring forward a motion on whether Parliament wants to seek a short, limited extension to Article 50."
If MPs vote for an extension, the Government will "seek to agree that extension approved by the House with the EU, and bring forward the necessary legislation to change the exit date commensurate with that extension", said Mrs May.
The Prime Minister said that an extension of Article 50 beyond the end of June would require the UK to take part in European Parliament elections in May and that a shorter extension would "almost certainly have to be a one-off".
"An extension cannot take no-deal off the table," she warned. "The only way to do that is to revoke Article 50, which I shall not do, or agree a deal."
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that Mrs May appeared to be adopting the terms of a cross-party amendment put forward by Yvette Cooper and Sir Oliver Letwin designed to prevent no-deal if her Withdrawal Agreement is voted down on March 12.
But he told MPs: "Until the Prime Minister is clear what alternative she would put forward in that circumstance, then she is continuing to run down the clock.
"She promises a short extension but for what?"
Mr Corbyn confirmed that Labour will table an amendment to the Government's motion calling for a deal based on its priorities of a customs union, close alignment with the single market and matching EU workplace and environmental rights.
"If the Government wants a genuine renegotiation it should do so on terms that can win a majority of this House, on terms backed by businesses and unions and that are contained within Labour's amendment, which I urge the whole House to back tomorrow," he said.
The Prime Minister hit out at Mr Corbyn over Labour's support for a second referendum.
"He has gone back on his promise to respect the referendum result and now wants to hold a divisive second referendum that would take our country right back to square one," she said.
"Anyone who voted Labour at the last election because they thought he would deliver Brexit will rightly be appalled."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel