Jeremy Corbyn has swung the Labour leadership behind a second EU referendum with an option to remain should his party’s preferred plan not get through Parliament.
The dramatic move came as Theresa May’s plane touched down following her trip to Egypt when she insisted a deal with Brussels was “within our grasp”.
But she placed herself on a collision course with a large number of Tory colleagues, including some in the Cabinet, when she set her face against calls to put back exit day from March 29 to allow more time for talks.
Today, she will update MPs on the “progress” in the Brussels talks; key will be the wording of the Government motion to be debated and voted on tomorrow evening.
After days of senior figures saying Labour was “moving towards” supporting a People’s Vote, Mr Corbyn announced the shift during a two-hour meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party at Westminster.
He explained Labour would table its own amendment, calling for a customs union with a UK say and close alignment with the single market, and would also support his colleague Yvette Cooper’s amendment to extend the Article 50 process to avoid a no-deal outcome.
But, significantly, the party leader said, if those failed, Labour would back an amendment “in favour of a public vote to prevent a damaging Tory Brexit".
A senior party source said the “assumption” would be that Remain would be on the ballot paper but made clear it would not be a straight choice between the Government’s deal and Remain as the former was unacceptable; various options were being considered.
But not everyone was happy. Backbencher John Mann reportedly claimed people in the North of England would "never vote Labour again". He told Mr Corbyn: “This decision will stop you being Prime Minister.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel