The UK intends to leave the EU as planned on March 29 despite Jean-Claude Juncker's suggestion that Britain could still be in the bloc for May's European elections, Brexit Minister Lord Callanan has said.
European Commission president Mr Juncker said he could not rule out an extension to the Article 50 process resulting in the UK participating in the European Parliament vote.
READ MORE: Second wave of Labour MPs set to quit in leadership row
But, arriving in Brussels for a meeting with fellow ministers, Lord Callanan insisted Theresa May had been clear that the March 29 deadline remained.
The Prime Minister has reportedly come under pressure from Cabinet ministers to seek an extension to Article 50 to avoid the UK crashing out of the European Union without a deal.
Mr Juncker said no-one on the EU side would oppose an extension to Article 50 which kept the UK in the bloc.
On the prospect of the UK electing MEPs to the new Parliament, he told German newspaper Stuttgarter Zeitung that such a scenario was "difficult to imagine", saying it would be a "belated joke of history" but he did not rule it out.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: Brexit chaos makes it very difficult to move forward on independence
But Lord Callanan said: "The Prime Minister has been very clear that we intend to leave on March 29, that's what Article 50 says and that's what our domestic legislation says."
At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, ministers were being briefed by Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay on his latest talks with Brussels as intensive efforts continue to resolve the deadlock over the Northern Ireland backstop.
Mr Barclay and Attorney General Geoffrey Cox were said to have had a "productive" discussion with the EU's chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, in the Belgian capital on Monday.
Lord Callanan said the EU had acknowledged that the backstop was "only ever intended to be temporary" and "we are seeking to explore with them how we can codify that in a legally-binding way that is acceptable to our Parliament".
The Department for Exiting the EU (DExEU) confirmed the discussions with Mr Barnier included the so-called "Malthouse compromise" being worked on by Tory MPs in the Alternative Arrangements Working Group.
However, there appeared to be little enthusiasm for the proposals - intended to replace the backstop with a basic free trade deal combined with technological solutions to avoid the need for physical border checks - on the EU side.
"While the commission engaged seriously with these proposals, it expressed concerns about their viability to resolve the backstop," a DExEU spokesman said.
Mrs May and Mr Juncker are expected to meet later this week for further talks.
The Prime Minister has reportedly been urged to stop using the threat of a no-deal Brexit as a negotiating tactic.
Business Secretary Greg Clark, Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd, Justice Secretary David Gauke and Scottish Secretary David Mundell warned Mrs May businesses now need certainty that the UK will not leave the EU without a deal in place, according to the Guardian.
The report comes after rebel Tory MPs last week inflicted another damaging Commons defeat on Mrs May's Brexit proposals, heightening fears among some in business of a no-deal break.
Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, is stepping up his call to the Prime Minister to re-think her negotiating "red lines" and back Labour's proposals for a customs union with the EU.
READ MORE: Brexit: Theresa May risks fresh showdown over Irish backstop as exit day nears
The Labour leader, who is addressing the EEF employers' group manufacturing conference, said he would be travelling to Brussels later this week to discuss the proposal with Mr Barnier.
In his speech, Mr Corbyn is expected to say: "It's a plan that could win the support of Parliament and help bring the country together.
"It has been widely welcomed as a way of breaking the impasse. So I call on the Government and MPs across Parliament to end the Brexit uncertainty and back Labour's credible alternative plan."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel