A SENIOR SNP MP has criticised one of Nicola Sturgeon’s closest advisers after he urged a slow build-up to the “softest possible” form of independence.
Joanna Cherry QC, the SNP’s justice spokesperson at Westminster, took to Twitter to publicly disagree with Andrew Wilson, the author of the party’s Growth Commission.
She said independence was needed as soon as possible to protect Scotland from Brexit, and promoted the call for a second referendum.
The intervention underlined splits in the Yes movement over the timing and strategy of another referendum as the First Minister delays her long-awaited update on the issue.
READ MORE: Key Sturgeon adviser urges 'softest possible form of Scottish independence'
Mr Wilson, a former MSP turned corporate lobbyist, said on Thursday that Ms Sturgeon should play a long and minimalist game on independence in order to woo voters.
He wrote in The National: “In the parlance of Brexit, we offer the softest of possible changes to the current arrangements, not the hardest. We recognise the level of integration and all the ties that have bound us for centuries. We create a platform that can unify a majority for progress that stands a chance of winning and winning big.”
He said more time was needed to recast the 2014 case for independence, likened leaving the UK to a “process rather than an event” and said Scotland was on a “journey without end”.
He also mocked those Yes supporters who want independence to be abrupt and radical.
“Some (a very small number) would rather move immediately and overnight to a Marxist revolutionary state. That is their right, but they won’t win the chance to try,” he said.
The comments drew a sharp response from Ms Cherry on Twitter.
She said: “You don’t have to be a ‘Marxist revolutionary’ to disagree with this softly softly strategy. Brexit is a catastrophe about to hit Scotland & the only way to protect our society & economy is #independence #indyref2.”
In a second tweet, she added: “As an MP on the #Brexit Select committee I’ve watched this disaster proceed in the face of all the evidence.
“I’m also aware that many of #EU27 are very sympathetic to #independence for Scotland & once UK is 3rd state that can translate to action #indyref2.”
READ MORE: SNP MP warns against 'bouncing' country into Indyref2
Jonathon Shafi, co-founder of the pro-independence far-left Rise alliance, also criticised the reference to a Marxist revolutionary state as “disingenuous from Andrew Wilson”.
He said: “For the sake of the debates and discussions @AndrewWilson should stop referring to opposition to the Growth Commission or the "softly softly" approach as a Marxist fringe. It does not help to the quality of the discourse and the movement deserves better.”
As an MP on the #Brexit Select commitee I’ve watched this disaster proceed in the face of all the evidence. I’m also aware that many of #EU27 are very sympathetic to #independence for Scotland & once UK is 3rd state that can translate to action #indyref2
— Joanna Cherry QC MP (@joannaccherry) February 15, 2019
Mr Shafi added: “I think this approach [to independence] simply begs the question: then what is the point?”
Chris McEleny, the leader of the SNP opposition on Inverclyde Council, and a candidate for SNP deputy leader last year, said: “Independence isn’t about a soft or hard independence. “It’s about the people of Scotland having their own choice. A choice between staying part of a union that gives us no choice on the EU, the poll tax, illegal wars, Trident, the rape clause and austerity, or the choice to live in a country where the people make all the choices that affect the way we live. Whether you think that’s ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ is irrelevant.”
READ MORE: Former SNP MP's Indyref Tube plan branded 'unhinged'
The anti-independence group Scotland in Union said there was no such thing as soft independence, and voters would not be fooled by the new sales pitch.
Mr Wilson last year produced a new economic blueprint for independence advocating a decade of public spending restraint and keeping the pound.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel