A failed UKIP candidate who has appeared in the BBC's Question Time audience four times has claimed he was invited on to the show.
William Mitchell, says he was invited by the BBC to fill the audience with more right-wing voices.
The former UKIP candidate became the centre of a row around bias in the BBC after eagle-eyed viewers complained about his recurring appearances.
READ MORE: BBC Question Time slammed after former UKIP candidate makes audience appearance for fourth time
Speaking to The Times, he claimed that he was invited by the show's producer to appear in the unionist-heavy audience in Motherwell last week, in part to make up a shortage of conservative speakers.
Audience members usually go through a process of applying to be on the show while answering key questions about political affiliations, voting history and if they have been on the programme before.
Mitchell claims that he was personally invited to appear on the pilot of Debate Night, the new Scottish equivalent of Question Time, but when he called to clarify details he was then invited to appear on both shows.
According to reports, he was only asked if he was a member of a political party.
Mitchell claims that the BBC knew his political affiliations due to his multiple appearances on previous shows and that the BBC sent him “offers for tickets all the time”.
Mitchell picked up just 34 votes when standing for Ukip in Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill in 2013.
Speaking with The Times, the BBC said that they did sometimes invite people to ensure a balance of views in the audience, before concluding: “We want to allow as many people as possible the chance to be part of the programme so we would not normally allocate a seat to someone if they had appeared recently. There is a detailed application process.”
This article also appeared in The National
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel