Prior to the passage of the Additional Support for Learning Act in 2004, about two per cent of pupils in Scotland had a statutory support plan.
When the co-ordinated support plan (CSP) replaced the record of needs (RoN) in 2004, the Scottish Government promised there would be no decline in the proportion of children receiving them.
This has clearly not been the case. Since 2011, there has been a year-on-year reduction in the number of CSPs opened, and if this trend continues they may virtually disappear.
Should we be concerned? Our research, conducted over the past thirty years, suggests ongoing tensions between local authority and parental views of CSPs.
Councils are largely unconcerned about the decline in the use of CSPs, regarding them as cumbersome and time consuming.
A number of councils question parental and children’s rights to mount legal challenges through the Additional Support Needs Tribunals for Scotland and are unhappy about the allocation of resources to individual children.
Local authorities argue they prefer to use other types of plan such as Child’s Plans, despite the fact these are not specifically education documents and have no directly enforceable rights associated with them.
Parents, on the other hand, believe statutory plans are important to ensure children’s needs are properly assessed, recorded and reviewed.
There are mixed messages from the Government on the importance of CSPs. In 2009, new duties were placed on councils to provide CSPs for looked after children and in 2018 a range of new rights were given to children aged 12-15, including the right to request a CSP.
At the same time, the Government has failed to ensure councils fulfill their existing duties, effectively ignoring the declining use of CSPs.
At a time when budgets are being squeezed, a number of changes are needed.
Firstly, the qualification criteria for a CSP should be simplified, so that a child should be entitled to a statutory support plan if they require support not normally available in school.
Secondly, there should be training for local authority and school staff, so there is better understanding of the system in general, including statutory entitlements.
Finally, the delegation to schools of responsibility for drawing up and reviewing CSPs has clearly not worked, and there needs to be a team within each council with clear responsibility for the administration of CSPs. In the current social and economic context, statustory plans are more important than ever to support the rights of children with ASN and their families.
Professor Riddell is chair of inclusion at Edinburgh University
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here