THERESA May has been accused by Labour of "utter hypocrisy" after it emerged that she voted against the implementation of the referendum approving the creation of the Welsh Assembly.
The SNP made the same charge, saying the Prime Minister had backed a wrecking amendment to the 1998 Scotland Bill.
In a keynote speech today in Stoke-on-Trent, which voted heavily to leave the EU, Mrs May once again urged her colleagues to back her Brexit Plan, warning that to reject it could lead to a no-deal outcome or the "more likely outcome is a paralysis in Parliament that risks there being no Brexit".
READ MORE: Scotland can't be in the passenger seat if the UK is driven off the Brexit cliff - Ian Blackford
But she also used her address to underline the importance of implementing the will of the people as expressed in referendums.
The PM noted how the result of the Welsh referendum of 1997 was "accepted by both sides" despite being carried by a wafer-thin 0.3 per cent majority and stressed that every referendum result in the UK had been honoured.
However, parliamentary records show that Mrs May was among 144 MPs who voted for an amendment which would have blocked the Government of Wales Bill giving effect to the Welsh referendum result.
Also backing the amendment were prominent Brexiteers Liam Fox, John Redwood, Iain Duncan Smith, Owen Paterson, Bernard Jenkin and John Whittingdale.
In 2005, the PM stood in the General Election under a Conservative manifesto promising a second referendum to decide whether to overturn the 1997 result.
In her speech, she said: "On the rare occasions when Parliament puts a question to the British people directly we have always understood that their response carries a profound significance.
"When the people of Wales voted by a margin of 0.3 per cent, on a turnout of just over 50 per cent, to endorse the creation of the Welsh Assembly, that result was accepted by Parliament.
"Indeed we have never had a referendum in the United Kingdom that we have not honoured the result of," declared Mrs May.
She went on: "Parliament understood this fact when it voted overwhelmingly to trigger Article 50. And both major parties did so too when they stood on election manifestos in 2017 that pledged to honour the result of the referendum.
"Yet, as we have seen over the last few weeks, there are some in Westminster who would wish to delay or even stop Brexit and who will use every device available to them to do so.
"I ask them to consider the consequences of their actions on the faith of the British people in our democracy.
"The House of Commons did not say to the people of Scotland or Wales that despite voting in favour of a devolved legislature, Parliament knew better and would over-rule them. Or else force them to vote again.
"What if we found ourselves in a situation where Parliament tried to take the UK out of the EU in opposition to a Remain vote? People’s faith in the democratic process and their politicians would suffer catastrophic harm.
"We all have a duty to implement the result of the referendum," insisted Mrs May.
READ MORE: Theresa May: No Brexit more likely than no deal
But the 2005 Conservative manifesto made clear that the party did suggest that the people of Wales should vote again, stating: "In Wales, we will work with the Assembly and give the Welsh people a referendum on whether to keep the Assembly in its current form, increase its powers or abolish it."
Labour MP for Cardiff Central Jo Stevens said the development had exposed "yet more utter hypocrisy from the PM, who, with other leading Brexit Tories, voted against legislation giving effect to the result of the Welsh referendum before it was implemented".
And Cardiff South & Penarth MP Stephen Doughty, a leading supporter of the Best for Britain campaign for a second referendum, said: "This is a very strange example for the PM to use - not least given she herself voted against implementing the Welsh referendum result, and the Tories continued to oppose it for years afterwards.
"But unlike Brexit - the Welsh Assembly grew in public support after the referendum. Brexit has headed decisively in the opposite direction - which is why the people should have the final say."
Meanwhile, Joan McAlpine the SNP MSP also took the PM to task, saying: “Theresa May is increasingly desperate; it seems she’ll now say absolutely anything, no matter how untrue, to try and force MPs to vote for her deal.
“This speech is brazen hypocrisy with Theresa May herself previously voting against a referendum result and then standing on a manifesto that sought a second referendum to overturn it.
“The Tories now think they can do anything they want to Scotland and get away with it. They campaigned tooth and nail to stop devolution in the first place, have launched a power-grab on the Scottish Parliament and are now doing everything they can to drag Scotland out of the EU against our will,” she added.
Before her speech, Mrs May's spokesman said he was sure that when she gave it, "it will be clear in regard to these matters".
In 1997, Wales voted for the creation of a devolved assembly by a margin of 559,419 to 552,698 - 50.3 per cent to 49.7 per cent. The Assembly was brought into being in 1999.
In Scotland, the pro-devolution vote was much more emphatic. The margin was 1,775,045 votes for and 614,400 against – 74.3 per cent to 25.7 per cent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel