THE firm embroiled in the clinical waste scandal is facing questions over whether animal remains were part of the company backlog.
Shotts-based Healthcare Environmental Services (HES) has been accused of stockpiling hundreds of tonnes of hospital waste, including body parts.
It has now emerged that Edinburgh Zoo also used the services of HES for animal remains.
Alex Cole-Hamilton, the Liberal Democrat MSP for Edinburgh Western, said:
“There are serious questions to be answered here. We need absolute confidence in the disposal of clinical and animal waste, and high standards must be maintained. There should be no risk to public safety.”
HES, which has sites across the UK, had over a dozen contracts with NHS trusts south of the border terminated over an unauthorised backlog of clinical waste. The Environment Agency revealed a criminal investigation had been launched.
The NHS in Scotland also distanced itself from the firm by announcing that its contract with HES would not be renewed. In turn, the company cited a lack of incineration capacity and criticised the UK Government.
Early coverage of the row focused on claims body parts were included in the stockpile.
In an interview with the BBC in October, HES managing director Garry Pettigrew said the backlog has “nothing to do with anatomical waste.”
He added: “Any anatomical waste would be stored in fridges and, at the same time, prioritised for outward bound.”
HES is now under the spotlight over whether all animal remains have been disposed of and incinerated.
A spokesperson for Edinburgh Zoo said they used HES’ services, but the work stopped in mid-December.
Asked whether the work included the disposal of dead animals, she said: “Yes it did.”
HES has gone into a tailspin, with mass staff redundancies and unpaid wages. Sources say there is still a backlog of waste at the Shotts facility.
Pettigrew could not be reached.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here