COLLEGE lecturers across Scotland have overwhelmingly backed strike action in a dispute over pay.
The Educational Institute of Scotland union said 90 per cent of members from colleges had backed industrial action following a long stand-off over cost of living increases. Turnout was 52 per cent.
Larry Flanagan, the union's general secretary, said members were asking for a fair cost of living increase, but this had been refused.
He said: "This resounding ballot result is a clear indication of the frustration and anger that our members are feeling.
"College management has dragged this process out for two years, using the delivery of equal pay across the sector as a barrier to negotiation and using conflated figures in publicity to obfuscate the pay claim.
"It is time for management avoid strike action by returning with a fair cost of living offer for lecturers."
However, John Gribben, director of employment services for Colleges Scotland's employers’ association, said the move was "extremely disappointing".
He said: "At the heart of this dispute, is that the EIS will not accept that the pay increases from national bargaining are increases in pay. They also want more pay for cost of living.
"The employers’ view is that a pay rise is a pay rise, irrespective of where it comes from, and the EIS has rejected a combined pay offer which would increase lecturers’ pay on average by more than 12 per cent three years – this is the best pay offer anywhere across Scotland’s public services.
"Finances are extremely tight for colleges and all of the 1.3 per cent term terms increase in revenue funding for colleges announced in last week’s 2019/20 draft Budget will be used for national bargaining."
John Swinney, the Education Secretary, said the Scottish Government had funded in full the additional costs of pay harmonisation across the sector "which delivers an average nine per cent increase to lecturers over three years".
He added: "I continue to urge both sides to resolve this dispute in a spirit of collaboration and co-operation as its continuation is in no-one’s interests, least of all our students.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel