Scots councils do not "recognise the value" of teaching children to play musical instruments, the Education Secretary has told a parliamentary inquiry.
John Swinney was giving evidence at inquiry into music tuition in schools by Holyrood's Education and Skills Committee.
Mr Swinney argued that the charges - set by individual local authorities - risked creating barriers for children wanting to play an instrument.
However, Mr Swinney revealed he was not considering direct funding grants from central government for music tuition to allow councils to stop charging families.
The former Finance Secretary said: "Some local authorities, despite all the issues that are raised generally about local authority finance, attach the priority to this that they make the eligibility for access to instrumental music tuition free.
Read more: Parents face fees of £350 for pupils to play a musical instrument
"Some local authorities recognise the value of instrumental music tuition and want to put in place no barriers to the access of instrumental music tuition as a consequence of the decisions that they've made."
He listed Dundee, Edinburgh, the Western Isles, Glasgow, Orkney, Renfrewshire and West Dunbartonshire as authorities that had not introduced charges.
Iain Gray MSP asked whether he was content or concerned by the variation in costs of musical tuition, as in one part of the country it may be free while "in another it cost a family quite a few hundreds of pounds".
Mr Swinney replied: "There is quite clearly a risk that the cost is an inhibitor to the participation of young people within instrumental music tuition."
Asked whether local authorities were living up to a 2013 commitment they would be charging for music tuition that led up to an SQA qualification, he said: "I can see no evidence of that happening, with the exception that I am concerned by what I am seeing in Midlothian Council which I don't think is consistent with the spirit of that commitment.
"It may be just-about passable by the letter of it, but I don't think it's consistent with the spirit."
Read more: Pupils taking up music tuition plummets after fees brought in
Also giving evidence were Cosla leaders representing Scotland's 32 councils.
Children and Young People spokesman Councillor Stephen McCabe blasted local government cuts.
He said: "The fundamental issue is not about ringfencing one area or protecting services, it is the chronic underfunding of local government over the last 10 years which this Parliament has presided over.
"Since 2011/12, core funding to local authorities has been reduced by £1.64 billion in real terms.
"No local authority makes the decision to introduce or indeed increase charges for any service lightly.
"However, the financial situation for local authorities continues to be very difficult and as a consequence councils have faced difficult decisions about funding."
Questioned on Cosla's submission ahead of the next week's Budget, Mr McCabe said: "We're looking for a fair settlement overall, there's no specific ask on music.
"But if we were were to get the settlement we are seeking, that would make it far easier for councils to protect services like music."
When the hypothetical option of more central government funding specifically for music tuition was suggested, Cllr McCabe described such a measure as a temporary "sticking plaster".
"It costs, we've estimated, £28 million a year to provide music tuition. Fees and charges, which aren't applied by every council, raise in the region of £4 million.
"Next year it will cost more than £28 million, it will cost more than £28 million the year after that because of inflation and wages going up.
"So we think simply saying 'find £4 million' to wipe out the charges is a very simplistic solution."
Lauren Bruce, Local Government Finance chief officer, explained cuts to local government disproportionately affect certain areas due to ringfencing around issues such as teacher numbers.
She said: "The savings that Local Government have to make from core budgets can only be taken from 42% of the budget that comes to a local authority."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel