PLANS to introduce extra measures to protect vulnerable witnesses in criminal trials are unfair and a “threat” to justice, campaigners have warned.
Euan McIlvride, of the Glasgow-based Miscarriages of Justice Organisation Scotland, said putting in place special measures for certain witnesses or complainers risked creating a “heightened sense of sympathy” among jurors.
It comes as MSPs consider new legislation which aims to reform how vulnerable witnesses are treated during trials. The move would see a greater reliance on pre-recorded evidence.
However Mr McIlvride insisted there was no objective test to decide what made someone vulnerable, and argued the proposals had not been “properly examined”.
He told a Holyrood committee: “We see an imbalance in the separate treatment of vulnerable witnesses and complainers, as against vulnerable accused.
“It seems to us surprising that we would be proposing to proceed with legislation which is, by definition, unbalanced in that way.”
He added: “We take that to constitute a threat to the trial process in that a witness or a complainer who is deemed to be vulnerable will derive some advantage in terms of credibility in the eyes of a jury.”
Mr McIlvride said the plans risked encouraging sympathy for witnesses and complainers at the expense of the accused.
He said: “I think if you are looking at deeming witnesses to be vulnerable on a blanket basis, just by virtue of the nature of the offence charged, there is a danger there.
“As we see it, the deeming of a witness or a complainer – particularly, we’re concerned about complainers – as being vulnerable, and the provision of special measures for them, will give them a status in the eyes of jurors which is an advantage, I would think, in an adversarial situation.
“There will be some support offered to their credibility, I think, in that situation.”
He said there should be a test to establish whether or not a complainer really is vulnerable. However, he argued children should be covered automatically.
Mr McIlvride was giving evidence to Holyrood’s justice committee, which is considering the Vulnerable Witnesses (Criminal Evidence) (Scotland) Bill.
This would introduce a new rule which would generally require children to give evidence in written or pre-recorded form in the most serious cases. Scottish ministers could then extend this to adults deemed to be vulnerable witnesses.
Grazia Robertson, of the Law Society of Scotland’s criminal law committee, insisted it was “difficult without formal assessment” to know what impact such rules have on jurors.
She said: "Certainly, with remote links – where the witness is not in court but jurors view the evidence on a screen – there has been concern that because the witness is at some distance, the jurors might not get the same feel for the evidence as they would if the witness was in court.
"Again, there are different views on that; the matter is not really settled."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here