Low-cost clothing can prove just as durable and sometimes offer better quality than designer fashion, a study has suggested.
Dr Mark Sumner, a lecturer in fashion and sustainability at the University of Leeds, said so-called fast fashion demonstrated “significantly better value for money” when compared to designer brands following a series of durability tests.
The study was said to have involved testing samples of T-shirts and jeans for seam strength and colourfastness, as well as how easy it was to tear a hole in the fabric or how long it took to rip an item.
Dr Sumner told the Sunday Telegraph: “Jeans from one fashion brand lasted twice as long as designer-label jeans, but cost just a tenth of the price.
“For the T-shirt work the designer label product was the worst performing product across all the tests we did with an online fast fashion brand out-performing all other products.”
Dr Sumner was among the experts asked to give evidence before MPs after concerns were raised about the mountains of inexpensive clothing that were being almost instantly discarded.
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) is worried that fast fashion has led to a rise in the amount of clothes being bought, leading to hundreds ofthousands of tonnes of clothing being dumped each year and poor working conditions in UK garment factories.
Dr Sumner told the Telegraph clothes were not necessarily being thrown away because they were poor quality, but because consumers “no longer like them or want them”.
He added: “We know that some clothing will be thrown away because it does actually wear out, but there’s no correlation to say that price will give you an indication to say which product will wear out.”
Expert evidence published by the EAC shows people in the UK buy more new clothes than any other European country – almost double that of consumers in Italy, Germany and the Netherlands – and purchase twice as much as 10 years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here