A no-deal Brexit would not be a disaster, International Trade Secretary Liam Fox has insisted.
Dr Fox said that reactions to Whitehall analysis showing that withdrawing from the EU without an agreement would have severe economic consequences had been "overblown".
The comments came as Prime Minister Theresa May tried to rally support for her deal by telling MPs to think of the needs of their constituents.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour MEP trying to stop Brexit quits job early
With Mrs May facing a tough challenge to get Parliament to approve her agreement in a crunch vote on December 11, a cross-party group of MPs has tabled an amendment to stop the UK leaving the EU without a deal.
Asked about a no-deal scenario, Dr Fox told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Well, I think, as Roberto Azevedo, director-general of the World Trade Organisation, said, it wouldn't be a disaster, but it wouldn't be a walk in the park either."
He added: "I think that the reactions to some of the Treasury analysis have been completely overblown."
Dr Fox, who insisted that Mrs May was "changing the public mood", appeared to suggest that some of his Cabinet colleagues may still vote against the PM's Brexit deal.
Asked if he thought the whole Cabinet would back the deal in the Commons, Dr Fox said: "I think members of the Cabinet will vote for the deal."
But hinting at potential further resignations from Mrs May's top team over Brexit, he added: "Members of the Cabinet who don't vote for the deal won't be members of the Cabinet."
READ MORE: Andrew McKie: Time to defeat the deal and hand the next move to the Government
With reports that up to 100 Tory MPs are ready to vote against the Brexit deal, Mrs May called for support in order to avoid "division and uncertainty".
Speaking as she travelled to the G20 economic summit in Argentina, the PM said: "A divided country is not a country that prospers."
Mrs May also accused Labour of pushing the UK towards a damaging no-deal Brexit by seeking to block her deal without offering a workable alternative.
In a bid to prevent a no-deal exit, Labour's Hilary Benn has tabled an amendment to the Government Brexit motion with cross-party support including prominent Tory Sarah Wollaston.
The amendment also calls for the Commons to be able to express its views about what should happen if Mrs May's deal is voted down.
The PM said a defeat in the Commons in would mean "there will be decisions to be taken by Government and by business in relation to the practical preparations they would be looking to make for no-deal."
She added: "The focus of myself and the Government is on the vote taking place on December 11. We will be telling MPs why we believe this is a good deal for the UK because it is a deal that delivers on the Brexit vote."
However, arch-Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg has written in the Daily Telegraph of an effort to "frighten and to gull (people) into acquiescing to a non-Brexit Brexit".
He added: "(The) Withdrawal Agreement contradicts its previous and clear policies, while its spokesmen insist that the reverse is true.
"In the 2017 manifesto, the Conservatives said that the country would leave the single market and the customs union.
"The backstop and the proposed treaty keep the whole of the UK in the customs union, which allows the EU to set tax rates, with Northern Ireland in the single market too.
"There was no footnote listing these exceptions. The promises were clear and have been broken."
Dr Fox, who has given his backing to Mrs May's deal, is using a speech on Friday to appeal for unity and support for the PM's stance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article