Theresa May has hit back at claims she is too "feart" to go up against Nicola Sturgeon in a TV debate on Brexit, as the Prime Minister insisted her withdrawal deal will be "good for the UK as a whole".
With the country's departure from the European Union looming in just four months, she also restated her opposition to any propspect of a second Scottish independence referendum.
"One thing we do know is what would be bad for the Scottish economy would be taking Scotland out of the UK," the PM said.
With speculation MPs could reject her Brexit agreement in a key Commons vote next month, Mrs May is touring the country in a bid to sell the package directly to voters.
But she stressed that as the planned TV debate with Labour's Jeremy Corbyn was "about a vote that's going to take place in the House of Commons" the SNP leader had no part to play in it.
READ MORE: Alison Rowat: Has UK's moment of clarity on Brexit arrived at last?
Downing Street earlier said as Ms Sturgeon was not an MP she would not be involved in the "meaningful vote" on the Withdrawal Agreement on December 11.
The First Minister responded by tweeting: "Neither are all the members of the public that the PM is currently appealing to here on her 'tour' of the country".
Mrs May, who was visiting the Scottish Leather Group in Bridge of Weir, Renfrewshire, said: "What we've negotiated is a Brexit deal that is good for the UK as a whole, it's good for Scotland, good for employers and Scottish fishermen.
READ MORE: Theresa May in the firing line after The National left out of press conference
"Support for the deal has been encouraged by employers like Diageo, the Scotch Whisky Association and the National Farmers Union of Scotland".
She also claimed "Scotland's interests have been taken into account throughout the negotiations we've been doing", arguing that leaving Europe gives the UK the chance to negotiate its own trade deals, which could help "iconic Scottish products like smoked salmon and Scotch whisky".
Pressed on whether leaving the EU could pave the way for a second independence referendum in Scotland, Mrs May insisted: "Now is not the time to be thinking about this.
"The UK faces a very important decision, it's a historic moment for the UK - we entered the EUC, as it was, as the whole UK and we're leaving the UK as a whole United Kingdom."
The Prime Minister said it was important her government "can deliver on the Brexit vote of the UK in the deal that we negotiated with the EU".
She added: "If you look at the Labour Party, they don't have a plan for a Brexit deal with the EU. What they seem to want to do is frustrate Brexit and we've heard that today from the Shadow Chancellor.
READ MORE: Theresa May warns Brussels: no deal on fishing by July 2020, no EU access to UK waters
"I believe it's important we deliver on the vote of the British people, I think it's about trust in politicians."
"This isn't a question about debating Leave of Remain, it isn't a question about re-running the referendum. It's about looking ahead to a vote that's taking place in the House of Commons when MPs will be looking at the deal the government has negotiated.
"I think people should be aware of what the proposals from the Leader of the Opposition are and from everything I've seen and heard he doesn't have a plan for Brexit."
Neither are all the members of the public that the PM is currently appealing to on her ‘tour’ of the country. #feart (as we say in Scotland). https://t.co/4bhZ1T5Qui
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) November 28, 2018
Ms Sturgeon attacked the Prime Minister the day after a Scottish Government paper warned the draft arrangements for the UK's departure from the European Union could result in a "loss equivalent to £1,610 per person in Scotland compared to EU membership by 2030".
Separate documents published by the UK Government showed its draft deal could cut the country's GDP by up to 3.9% over the next 15 years.
Leaving the EU without a deal in place could cause the economy to shrink by 9.3% over the same period, the analysis claimed.
It warned the UK will be poorer in economic terms under any version of Brexit compared with staying in the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel