A People’s Vote is currently the most likely option MPs will rally behind should they reject Theresa May’s Brexit Plan in a key Commons vote next month, sources at Westminster have said.
This week, Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer, the Shadow Brexit Secretary, and Stephen Gethins, the SNP’s Europe spokesman, are due to have private talks on their parties coming together to back the “best alternative plan” to what they regard as the Prime Minister’s botched Brexit deal. The talks will follow on from last week’s meeting at Westminster between Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister, and Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader.
Labour’s Brexit proposal is for the UK to be in a customs union with the EU, to be as near to the single market as possible and to protect workers’ rights and privileges; the SNP’s is to keep the country in the current single market and customs union. The key point of disagreement between the two parties appears to be on the issue of freedom of movement; Labour wants restrictions, the Nationalists do not.
Read more: EU27 backs Brexit deal as Nicola Sturgeon challenges Theresa May to head-to-head debate
Plus, there is the issue of optics. Labour and the SNP forming a united front on the future of Brexit will leave them open to accusations of cosying up to pave the way for the Nationalists to prop up a Labour government in a hung Parliament in return for a promise of facilitating another vote on Scotland’s future.
Indeed, Annie Wells, the Scottish Conservative MSP, said on Sunday that it was becoming increasingly clear that Mr Corbyn was “cooking up a deal” with Ms Sturgeon to get him into Downing St.
“Labour at Westminster can't be trusted to defend our Union. Labour at Holyrood are too toothless to do anything about it. Only the Scottish Conservatives at both Westminster and Holyrood will stand up against Nicola Sturgeon’s obsession with a second independence referendum," said the Glasgow MSP.
Read more: UK-EU Brexit agreement has 'sold out Scotland' says Mike Russell
Sources close to the Lab/SNP talks pointed out how there were currently two main alternatives: some form of customs union/single market option and staging another referendum.
One senior insider noted: “As things stand, a People’s Vote is gaining traction and seems the likelier option because it will be easier to get support from the Remainer Tories and the Lib Dems. But, as with everything to do with Brexit, things might change.”
Speculation about Labour warming to a second referendum has been stoked by suggestions that John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor, held talks with Tom Baldwin and Alastair Campbell, the former respective spin doctors to Ed Miliband and Tony Blair, who are now campaigning for a so-called People's Vote.
The former Prime Minister told the Andrew Marr Show "It's moving that way", adding: " I would be really surprised if the Labour Party doesn't end up in the position of supporting another vote because there's no other proposition that can get through Parliament."
Read more: France would use fishing demands as 'leverage' in post-Brexit trade talks
Meanwhile, it is suggested five Remainer ministers - David Lidington, Philip Hammond, Amber Rudd, Greg Clark and David Gauke - have agreed to try to get Mrs May to adopt a softer Brexit, involving a permanent customs partnership with the EU, if she fails to get her current proposal through the Commons.
Meanwhile on Tuesday, judges at the European Court of Justice will rule on a case brought by politicians across different parties as to whether or not the UK Government could unilaterally end the Article 50 process and keep Britain in the EU.
If they rule that it can, then this option could become the key alternative to Mrs May’s rejected plan; it would mean MPs and not the public voting to keep Britain in the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel